Reef Central Online Community

Reef Central Online Community (http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/index.php)
-   Do It Yourself (http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   cutting glass (http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1733011)

svynx 11/02/2009 08:07 AM

cutting glass
 
I am cutting slots in the back of my 75 gallon for an external overflow. I know I need a diamond saw. What I don't know is what blade/tool I should use. I am planning on using a 1/2" diamond hole saw for the ends, but it's the long cuts that I'm worried about. I don't feel that a dremel would be a good choice. The cut will be about 24" long, and trying to keep it straight might be problematic.

sjames 11/02/2009 08:23 AM

personally, i would rethink your need for a slot. Cutting this slot as a hobbyist is a high risk, low reward scenario.

svynx 11/02/2009 08:39 AM

The reason I'm doing it is because the 75gal tank is only 18" front to back. With the C2C which will be about 4" to 5" sticking into the tank, that's quite a lot of space taken up. By making the cut, I'll be able to put the overflow externally. I've also though about instead of making one big cut, I'll have two 12" slots with 8" in between them.

der_wille_zur_macht 11/02/2009 09:37 AM

How about this approach:

1) Build a small, low-profile C2C box inside the tank
2) Drill several holes in the wall of the tank, inside this box
3) Build a large external box, with holes in the bottom, for your standpipes

The only cuts you have to make are holes, which are easy. It won't take up much room inside the tank, and you get all the benefit and flexibility of an external C2C.

I've seen uncleof6 post designs similar to this several times, maybe he'll come along.

svynx 11/02/2009 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by der_wille_zur_macht (Post 15955962)
How about this approach:

1) Build a small, low-profile C2C box inside the tank
2) Drill several holes in the wall of the tank, inside this box
3) Build a large external box, with holes in the bottom, for your standpipes

The only cuts you have to make are holes, which are easy. It won't take up much room inside the tank, and you get all the benefit and flexibility of an external C2C.

I've seen uncleof6 post designs similar to this several times, maybe he'll come along.

That's a good idea. I'd like to see a tank with that on it. I'll have to search for it. Many thanks.

Rwinfrey 11/02/2009 10:15 AM

glass holes makes a really nice low profile box

der_wille_zur_macht 11/02/2009 10:43 AM

Definitely, but you pretty much have to use it with their durso-style drain. And they're not coast to coast. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but you're locked in.

uncleof6 11/02/2009 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svynx (Post 15956070)
That's a good idea. I'd like to see a tank with that on it. I'll have to search for it. Many thanks.

http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/u.../der-wille.jpg

http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/u...der-wille1.jpg

http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/u...der-wille2.jpg

svynx 11/02/2009 12:21 PM

That looks good, and looks like it would work well. Since I'll be doing it on the back panel (48") and using Bean's overflow system, would you recommend drilling more than 2 holes...3 or 4, to aid in getting the flow to the external part?

uncleof6 11/02/2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svynx (Post 15956828)
That looks good, and looks like it would work well. Since I'll be doing it on the back panel (48") and using Bean's overflow system, would you recommend drilling more than 2 holes...3 or 4, to aid in getting the flow to the external part?

Just to give an indication of the flow rate through an open hole (no bulkhead or plumbing,) a 2 3/8" hole (62mm) with the water level 1" above the top of the hole would be ~1920 gph, and a 3" hole (just did this one in pm) would be ~3060 gph. (rounded off to nearest gpm in the math, and is dependent on several variables including atmospheric pressure, viscosity etc.)

In talking with BeanAnimal about this particular design, some "design criteria" became apparent. (For safety with glass tanks, the holes need to be 1 - 1.5 x the hole diameter down from the top and edges of the glass.)

The internal "weir" would be set (usually) at the bottom of the external rim of the tank (~1" down from the top of the glass) to hide the waterline, and the internal box would extend to below the holes in the back. The external box and standpipes, should be "situated" on the back so that the water level of the overflow system is at the vertical center of the hole. (the widest part.) The external box needs to extend above/below the holes enough to give you the vertical adjustment to dial the system in. Keeping the water level at or nearest to the centerline of the hole will give you the freest flow, and quietest operation between the internal and external box, while maintaining the surface skimming between the internal/external boxes.

Key factors in this design is freeflow through the holes, and maintaining the surface skimming from internal to external. You don't want bulkheads in the holes, attaching the internal box to the back wall, such as in the gl*******s.com system, rather a blank hole. The bulkheads will inhibit the free flow. Just as the length of a "weir" affects the surface skimming of the DT, so would the number of holes between the internal and external boxes. The number of holes will also make it more freeflowing.

So the simple answer would be 4 holes be better than 2, 6 holes be better than 4. But let's not get too carried away with it.

This should give you a place to start using 5 holes.

http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/u...ntitled-12.jpg

A system similar to this is under construction (60",) however the client is out of funds at the moment, (seems to be an epidemic w/associated collateral damage), and it is stalled. So ultimately how many holes there will be is uncertain yet. (or if it will ever be completed)

Jim

svynx 11/02/2009 03:22 PM

I must say Jim, you saved me some time.
"Just as the length of a "weir" affects the surface skimming of the DT, so would the number of holes between the internal and external boxes. The number of holes will also make it more freeflowing."
My thoughts exactly.
Many thanks. Looks like a winner to me.
Joel

jacksonpt 11/09/2009 02:18 PM

Thanks for the link/diagram Jim!

I'm thinking about doing something VERY similar to the above diagram and have a few questions...

Does the depth (front to back, not top to bottom) of the internal box affect flow rate to the external box? Could the inner box only be 1" deep and still get good flow and low noise?

I got thinking about this after reading about Bean's overflow - I assume I'd still want to use his plumbing setup inside the external box to keep a continuous siphon and have 2 failsafes?

I'm thinking about using bulkheads between the two boxes. I know they will reduce flow, but they will also help ensure water tightness, and give some stability/rigidity to the exterior box. Would some aquarium silicone + 2 bulkheads be reasonable for attaching the external box to the side of the tank? I suspect my external box will be something like 11"w x 4"d x 4"h, fwiw.

I'm sure I'll have more questions as I get my head around this...

TIA.

coyote97 11/09/2009 03:00 PM

Tagging along.

I'm on the verge of getting my tank wet to test my take on the Bean Animal Overflow.
[IMG]http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/...7/100_0997.jpg[/IMG]
Since this pic I've changed the second pipe from the right and used bushings instead of drilling a cap for the John Guest fittings. I have a 1/4" ball valve and two 45 degree elbows sending the 1/4 tubing back down to break the siphon in an emergency. The pipe to the far right is the emergency pipe hence no T and turned down elbow. Will this make mine loud? I'm going to find out, I guess. Comments are welcomed. Some things are still not glued so I could still make some last minute modifications.

uncleof6 11/09/2009 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacksonpt (Post 15994563)
Thanks for the link/diagram Jim!

I'm thinking about doing something VERY similar to the above diagram and have a few questions...

Does the depth (front to back, not top to bottom) of the internal box affect flow rate to the external box? Could the inner box only be 1" deep and still get good flow and low noise?

I got thinking about this after reading about Bean's overflow - I assume I'd still want to use his plumbing setup inside the external box to keep a continuous siphon and have 2 failsafes?

I'm thinking about using bulkheads between the two boxes. I know they will reduce flow, but they will also help ensure water tightness, and give some stability/rigidity to the exterior box. Would some aquarium silicone + 2 bulkheads be reasonable for attaching the external box to the side of the tank? I suspect my external box will be something like 11"w x 4"d x 4"h, fwiw.

I'm sure I'll have more questions as I get my head around this...

TIA.

I would not go so "narrow" but rather stay in the 2" - 3" range. And I would not use bulkheads in the tank back either... yes it will reduce the free flow between the inner and outer box, but then the better design of this has the inner and outer box siliconed to the back glass, not boxes attached with bulkhead. Here for a better illustration of the boxes themselves:

http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/u.../der-wille.jpg

http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/u...der-wille1.jpg

http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/u...der-wille2.jpg

The dimensions of the external are dictated by the plumbing size, not by choice as it were, as there needs to be vertical adjustment, with the water line at the center of the flow through holes. The first drawing (linked) is pretty much what you got when using 1.5" pipe size. (To use a tee anyway.) Why a tee? You have to consider how to unplug a line if it gets clogged, and just an elbow in the external, would make that really hard, without taking the whole thing apart.......

Jim

squid_fart 11/09/2009 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coyote97 (Post 15994806)
Tagging along.

I'm on the verge of getting my tank wet to test my take on the Bean Animal Overflow.
[IMG]http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/...7/100_0997.jpg[/IMG]
Since this pic I've changed the second pipe from the right and used bushings instead of drilling a cap for the John Guest fittings. I have a 1/4" ball valve and two 45 degree elbows sending the 1/4 tubing back down to break the siphon in an emergency. The pipe to the far right is the emergency pipe hence no T and turned down elbow. Will this make mine loud? I'm going to find out, I guess. Comments are welcomed. Some things are still not glued so I could still make some last minute modifications.

Any particular reason why your return lines are going up through the overflow box? Seems like a waste of bulkheads/adding unneeded strain on your overflow box.

uncleof6 11/09/2009 05:57 PM

Sorry for the redundant photos, sometimes I forget what thread I am in, or cross things up.

Jim

coyote97 11/10/2009 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by squid_fart (Post 15995516)
Any particular reason why your return lines are going up through the overflow box? Seems like a waste of bulkheads/adding unneeded strain on your overflow box.

I didn't want to try to plumb around the overflow. I guess I will find out if there's strain on the box, but that thing is on there. There's a good amount of silicone and that stuff is strong.

sean04 11/20/2009 05:38 PM

Jim,

To get the water line to be in the center of the drilled holes in the internal box, what are the heights of your 3 pipes. I guess mainly what is the height of the siphon line in the external box? Does the siphon line elbow need to be completely submerged in the external box when the water is at the center water line shown in your drawing?

Thanks.

uncleof6 11/20/2009 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean04 (Post 16062227)
Jim,

To get the water line to be in the center of the drilled holes in the internal box, what are the heights of your 3 pipes. I guess mainly what is the height of the siphon line in the external box? Does the siphon line elbow need to be completely submerged in the external box when the water is at the center water line shown in your drawing?

Thanks.

The water line is adjustable using a valve on the full siphon drain line. Generally, the water line is ~ the horizontal center line of the elbow. The elbow will not be fully submerged usually. On 1.5" pipe, the bottom of the Tee is 2 3/8" below the elbow center line. The inlet to the elbow is a little less. You want the inlet of the elbow ~1" give or take off the floor of the external overflow, ideally. The above drawing has some "wiggle" room to adjust the Tee up and down, to dial things in.

Jim

2_zoa 11/20/2009 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uncleof6 (Post 16063496)
The water line is adjustable using a valve on the full siphon drain line. Generally, the water line is ~ the horizontal center line of the elbow. The elbow will not be fully submerged usually. On 1.5" pipe, the bottom of the Tee is 2 3/8" below the elbow center line. The inlet to the elbow is a little less. You want the inlet of the elbow ~1" give or take off the floor of the external overflow, ideally. The above drawing has some "wiggle" room to adjust the Tee up and down, to dial things in.

Jim

Not trying to hijack here but,

I am building a 75. I have it drilled for Beans system. The three holes like he pictured in his thread. I really like the idea you have up on here. I have drilled 2 3/8 " holes now and can add 2 -3 more if I need to, to employ this design. Since my holes are more or less on one side, do you think it would hurt me to add another three matching holes on the other side of my tank? Also, my sch 80 bulkheads that I am using, How wide do you think I should have the glass cut for the bottom of the externial portion of the OF box? I can post a pic if you would like. A pic of the holes that is, or give you measurements.

sean04 11/22/2009 11:25 PM

Thanks Jim.

uncleof6 11/22/2009 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2_zoa (Post 16064471)
Not trying to hijack here but,

I am building a 75. I have it drilled for Beans system. The three holes like he pictured in his thread. I really like the idea you have up on here. I have drilled 2 3/8 " holes now and can add 2 -3 more if I need to, to employ this design. Since my holes are more or less on one side, do you think it would hurt me to add another three matching holes on the other side of my tank? Also, my sch 80 bulkheads that I am using, How wide do you think I should have the glass cut for the bottom of the externial portion of the OF box? I can post a pic if you would like. A pic of the holes that is, or give you measurements.

I would like to see the holes evenly spread out, but three more similarly placed at the opposite end can't hurt.

The Exterior should be wide enough to fit everything in, with wiggle room, be mindful though, that the holes in the floor of the external box violate the safe spacing rule around 5" front to back.

Jim

2_zoa 11/23/2009 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uncleof6 (Post 16077019)
I would like to see the holes evenly spread out, but three more similarly placed at the opposite end can't hurt.

The Exterior should be wide enough to fit everything in, with wiggle room, be mindful though, that the holes in the floor of the external box violate the safe spacing rule around 5" front to back.

Jim


Going with this type of setup I would like to see the holes evenly spaced as well but, I already drilled it. I kinda wish I would have seen this or thought of it sooner. In my excitement I drilled away. There is something about this system that I like, I like it just as much as I like Beans drain.

5" will give me 3/4" on either side of the bulkhead. The other thing is that the bottom of the box is held tight by a lot of silicone directly on the sides of the bulkheads. With the uprights (walls) of the box, the bottom panel wont be subjected to any real force since the walls act as strong backs. Right?

uncleof6 11/23/2009 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2_zoa (Post 16081753)
Going with this type of setup I would like to see the holes evenly spaced as well but, I already drilled it. I kinda wish I would have seen this or thought of it sooner. In my excitement I drilled away. There is something about this system that I like, I like it just as much as I like Beans drain.

5" will give me 3/4" on either side of the bulkhead. The other thing is that the bottom of the box is held tight by a lot of silicone directly on the sides of the bulkheads. With the uprights (walls) of the box, the bottom panel wont be subjected to any real force since the walls act as strong backs. Right?

I figure there should be ~1 5/16" on either side of the hole. You knock the pipes, the bottom glass may break. I would use thicker glass for the bottom panel.

Jim

2_zoa 11/23/2009 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uncleof6 (Post 16082554)
I figure there should be ~1 5/16" on either side of the hole. You knock the pipes, the bottom glass may break. I would use thicker glass for the bottom panel.

Jim

I was going off of the very outside edge of the bulkhead itself. Sorry I should have been more clear.

Will do on the thicker glass. Thanks for the heads up on it being bumped. I do however plan on securing my pipeing. I just don't like having plumbing floating in space.

I think I have stolen enough of this thread. My appoliges to the OP of the thread.

Thank you uncleof6 for all your help.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.