View Single Post
Unread 07/18/2017, 07:48 AM   #23
65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 48
Thx for the great discussion. Slief's notion that a lot more people would be using this tech if it worked as advertised is on point. Maybe there needs to be a test! �� I suppose it would entail running straight UV vs. UV/Ozone combo unit on very similar systems for a significant period of time. Even then it would be difficult to tell which unit works better without dosing some nasty stuff. Undersranding the physics of how UV and Ozone work may have to suffice. What are the flow requirements for each? I thought Ozone reacted so quickly that flow was inconsequential.


65 is offline   Reply With Quote