[slief]

Originally Posted by Cpeguero83

Thanks for the in depth response. The initial attraction to the CV was perceived low cost. However, like so many things, you get what you pay for. I mean, I did go for the rd3’s, so no reason to let cost dominate my choice for controller.

I’m glad to hear that you’ve had good experiences with the trident. I guess I’m particularly keen on not having to deal with replacing reagents, though I imagine the ion director will require some kind of periodic calibration or probe replacement.

Based on your experience, what’s the biggest difference between GHL and Apex? There seems to be a huge user base for Apex, but my impression of GHL (based on what I see on forums) is better build quality. Any truth to that assessment?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GHL is a smaller company. Their hardware design and software is vastly different. GHL has a very good reputation is and know for rock solid hardware. While Neptune is a much larger company, with that comes greater volume and potentially higher failure rates but both have been rock solid for me. .