View Single Post
Unread 09/14/2018, 07:45 AM   #15
CrayolaViolence
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by McPuff View Post
This is so true!

The reason many of us are so insistent on QT is because we've tried the other route. I lost an entire tank full of beautiful angels, triggers, and tangs because of a no QT approach. After two years of great success I added one fish and within a week everything was dead. That makes you feel helpless and (more strongly) guilty for what happened to the fish. The community does not want to be jerks by insisting on QT... we are trying to help others avoid these terrible situations. A few months spent QTing fish is better than a possible year to rebuild another established system because you lost everything and had to tear it all down and start again. It also costs a LOT less to do it the right way.
You are very correct. And I'm glad the seasoned reefers and fish keepers speak up


__________________
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether you believe it or not." Neil deGrasse Tyson

Current Tank Info: 90 gallon reef tank
CrayolaViolence is offline   Reply With Quote