|
01/26/2019, 06:26 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 767
|
Conductivity Probe Calibration?
I have the 2016 APEX and I was told to do it this way:
Dry probe about 2hrs out of tank Put tank temp at 77 degrees Let calibration solution float in tank for 30 min Do manual calibration Set TC at 2.2 Update apex Now start manual calibration Wait about 2 min to settle (dry) Put probe in solution(In sump) tap on probe to release bubbles wait at least 5 min after that probe should be calibrated.. This correct? |
01/26/2019, 06:59 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 276
|
Yes but you over complicating a bit.
I will assume here that you have s yemp prob in the tank connected to apex No need to change tank temp, as long ad you make the solution similar to tank temp(hence you put the solution bag in the sump to have it the same temp) you should be good. Because the prob use the temp from the prob to adjust the reading based on temp change. Also no need for 2 hours to dry the prob, I dry it using a towel without too much rubbing, then leave it for like 10 20min while the calibration solution in the sump then I calibrate. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
01/27/2019, 05:24 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 767
|
Ok finally got my probe working.. Showing 34.9ppt and my Milwaukee showing 35ppt.. I am guessing my Milwaukee off a bit.
|
01/27/2019, 05:26 PM | #4 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
|
01/27/2019, 05:27 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 767
|
Yea I have an alarm if Salt goes less than 32ppt or shut off my ATO.. Or that not good to do?
|
01/27/2019, 05:30 PM | #6 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
If you are looking at accuracy you need to use other devices like reflectometer or Milwaukee. Use apex prob with +-2ppt accuracy in mind. Do not believe anyone who tell you otherwise. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
|
01/27/2019, 05:31 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 276
|
One more thing. Make sure you have a temp prob connected to you pm2 module because the probe use the temp pulled by the same module its connected to...at least that how I remember once heared from neptune
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
01/27/2019, 05:38 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 767
|
I have the APex 2016 model and no PM2..
I heard the TC factor is the issue and has to be played with. I have it set to 2.2. However, when changed value it does nothing lol.. unless that is based off temp because my temp is 77 degrees and constant |
01/27/2019, 10:54 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 7,818
|
The published resolution and accuracy of the Milwaukee MA887 is 1.0 PPT and +/-2.0 PPT respectively. Therefore, there is no valid basis for your saying that the Apex is off. Likewise, there is no reason here for the OP to suspect that his Milwaukee is not correct.
The 0.1 PPT difference between the OP's Milwaukee and his Apex salinity probe is inconsequential; for all practical intents and purpose, the two measurements are the same. |
01/27/2019, 11:26 PM | #10 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
I was trying to explain the right expectation instead of just blindly advocating to the apex. Basically I was avoiding the good old argument of" but then other side is bad as well". I use reflectometer and calibrate it every time before use. That's the best way. Apex prob is not good absolut measurment way, it's a good relative measurment. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
|
01/30/2019, 09:37 PM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 2,592
|
I think you're missing the point Russ was trying to make. No one is advocating one over the other.
Even if everything is perfectly calibrated, the published resolution and accuracy figures have to do with the electronics and software behind the numbers the display is telling you. With perfect calibration, if the readings between the Apex and Milwaukee units are less than +/- 2 ppt from each other, that is within their stated accuracies and should be considered equal. For example, if my thermometer had an accuracy of +/- 2 deg F, and I was reading 80 deg F but I knew for certain it was actually in 82 deg F water... that would still be within the accuracy of the thermometer. The thermometer is not "wrong" or "inaccurate" at all... it's just doing the best it can. |
01/30/2019, 10:34 PM | #12 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
|
01/30/2019, 10:36 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 276
|
Here is my 4 months old apex salinity prob.
I kid you not I have got 6 thus far over 3 years on 2 seprate setups. The 35ppt point is the day I calibrated the prob. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
02/06/2019, 11:37 AM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,136
|
And here is mine with Temp overlayed. Does not drift over time.
__________________
Vincent 40g custom AIO --> DSA190Pro |
Thread Tools | |
|
|