|
12/05/2014, 07:17 AM | #26 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 214
|
Beautiful Corals maoiwowie! Will you start fragging some of them when it gets a little bigger? I would love to own me some of those for sure. Im a few hours up north from you and wouldnt mind making a trip out of it.
|
12/05/2014, 09:39 AM | #27 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
Quote:
sh8g8delik - Of course. But if i can get my actual display built and installed, it could be awhile before im ready to give out frags. Except for the damn plate M. Caps that im growing. They take up too much valuable real estate. |
|
12/05/2014, 12:30 PM | #28 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,941
|
Quote:
I've been keeping SPS for 25+ years and the husbandry has changed some but patience is still key. Beware of the LED/MH/T5 debate. They all can lead to success. Quote:
And a FWIW, I've successfully grown a lot of SPS without once measuring potassium. If I have color, growth, for all appearances healthy SPS, then I don't check anything except Alk. Less is more when it comes to testing. It's right up there with patience. |
||
12/05/2014, 03:19 PM | #29 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
Yes. I like to document almost everything that goes into my tank. I wasnt always like this as I began my hobby very casually like most everyone. I learned through the years that the better tanks were not accomplished through being casual or lazy. Like any garden, it needs tending to. A coral sps garden needs even more.
I totally agree with Reefvet. When you are just learning you need to test your water and compare it to what you see is going on in your tank. Its not as simple as my PO4 is like that TOTM so I should have the same results. Every tank is different. Here is an example in pictures what Reefvet touched on. Every tank is different. "Beware of the LED/MH/T5 debate. They all can lead to success." The following set of pictures is the progression of a frag I bought off "jrpdriver", another member on this site. He uses LED only and when I visited him to pick up some frags, I was amazed at the color and the health of his tank. It wasnt just light manipulation to make corals pop. They were truly colorful. I brought this frag home and it looked like this under my MH. After 4 weeks in my tank it, it looked like this. Today it looks like this His mother colony and beginning frag still looks better. I dont know if the frag I bought will ever get to look like his. It is what it is. MH better than LED? Or vice versa? Every tank is different. As far as testing goes. I dont test as much for PO4 or NO3 anymore, maybe monthly. But I do still test ALK almost every other day. |
12/06/2014, 12:54 PM | #30 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
I had patience with my algae problems. As I started collecting frags, the algae hit me and hit hard. It was a punky algae party, but it was alright; valonia, bryopsis, dinos, hair, cyano... you name it. You can barely see the frags it was so thick. So I decided to make PVC platforms. It was just easier to keep the frags clean of the invading algae. And it also allowed the frags to base out. I think i could just attach the PVC somehow to my rockwork later. Might work out perfectly. The PVC is simply a female 1" plug combined with a 1" male plug. Its drilled out on top to fit the actual frag plug and also filled with sand to give it weight. I did lose some frags, but amazingly most survived even as I added frags.
I definitely think the algae problem was a combination of feeding and reusing some old dry live rock accumulated over 15 years of setting up tanks. I didnt even bother to clean/cure the dry rock. It was sitting in the corner of my garage in a couple of plastic garbage cans... and one day I decided I needed more biofilter surface area and just threw them in. So they were phosphate sinks... probably. I know people just advise to "start over". But I decided to be patient. Let the algae party go until they decided it was over. And I knew it was going to take a long time. I made sure to do regular weekly water changes, start vodka/vinegar/zeo, add a refugium, and limit feeding and additives. And I tested my water regularly to make sure PO4 and NO3 were not climbing. Gradually both parameters started to fall. The party started in March and is just now finally clear enough to be presentable. I still have some waiting for last call, but it no longer 'grows' on the eggcrate. And although the algae was an eyesore, it did consume the PO4 and NO3 that might have helped save the frags(?). I do believe phosphate is still in the rock. |
12/06/2014, 09:44 PM | #31 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,941
|
|
12/07/2014, 01:22 PM | #32 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
I have been in this hobby for 30 years and have killed a lot of living sea creatures through ignorance, laziness, and apathy. But I have learned a lot... still learning.
I consider my system a hybrid as I combine the Zeo method with other methods. I began using zeolites in a Vibe reactor but now use it passively in my sump. I dont see a big difference with using just the reactor. I dont use the full recommended amount for my volume of water either, about 60%. I continue to use V/V as a carbon source, although for my approximate 170+ gallons I only dose about 10ml every other day. I also use Kalk for my top off and a refugium. Both are not needed or recommended with the Zeo method. The kalk is used for increasing PH and and as a quasi boost for alk and calcium in lieu of my calcium reactor. This tank is in my office so weekends its on its own. I have come back on mondays to find the calcium reactor stuck many times with too much gas in the chambers. The tank eats a lot of alk. Maybe that is why i test alk so often. As far as the actual supplements, I have an array from KZ pictured below. Although I bought the supplements when I started, I quickly figured out that I dont need or use most of them. But again, its not an exact science. I use some of them because I bought them and I probably wont buy them again once exhausted. I do use Zeostart3 (fancy vinegar), Zeobac (fancy bacteria), and AA and Coral Vitalizer (fancy coral food) regularly, although at half the recommended dosage. I also use K-Balance Strong to help keep my potassium at "Natural Sea Levels." If you look to the left, I use syringes to dose in exact amounts and each additive has its own syringe to prevent cross contamination. I keep a calendar app to remind me when to dose and what to dose and record anything i did differently or new. The colors of the corals are improving slowly, but I have seen tanks with better coloring without the use of KZ supplements... I never think anything good will happen quickly only bad, Ill have patience. One thing id like to mention about all these additives and methods. For me i use them to try to keep my tank at "Natural Sea Levels." It keeps things simple for me. Some threads boast how they can keep color at high PO4 or NO3 levels. Thats great, but why? and so what? And many reefers get confused and ask what they should keep their levels at? Strive for natural sea levels of the location where your corals are found and you cant go wrong. In my experience, Alk is perhaps the only parameter that can be manipulated to the high side... but keep that stable and not too high. |
12/08/2014, 11:03 AM | #33 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
KZ has so many different supplements like Eisen, Jodi, Kaliumiodid-Fluor, Sponge Power, XTRA, XTRA special, B-Balance, Macroelements, and more. I have used and continue to use some of them, but VERY sparingly. I dont want to recommend using these as I cant validate if they do anything. That might be because it takes time to see their effects. Perhaps collectively they do help in subtle ways. If you want more info on these, i would suggest poking around the Zeo site. Can I say that?
|
12/08/2014, 11:30 AM | #34 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,941
|
Quote:
IF you follow the complete system and strip your water of everything then they are necessary. If not, they're too subtle to accomplish anything perceivable. And FWIW, the new reverse flow calcium reactors run with a probe monitored by an Apex or other controller offer a great way balance a reef. |
|
12/08/2014, 12:57 PM | #35 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
Thanks... Ill check those RO Calcium Reactors out. I even added a second chamber to my existing reactor, but it still acts up...
I do like some of the results I have gotten from some of the aspects of Zeo. The use of zeoliths is simple once you gain some experience. Just dont over do it, is what i learned. I have also stopped using GFO, UV, and Ozone and ill probably never go back. Another thing is no matter what method I choose, there is no magic potion, and nothing makes up for poor husbandry. The money we spend on frags alone should be incentive enough not to be lazy... For anyone wondering, here is a picture of my refugium. Obviously im not running a sterile environment or ULNS. I started with some Chaeto, but it has been out competed by a kind of caluerpa (racemosa?) that just one day showed up. I do think the refugium helps with the nuisance algae that plagued my frag tank; and gives evidence that there is still a lot of phosphate in the tank or in the rocks (stink rock from garage), even though my testing says otherwise. One comment about tests and hobby test kits. With experience, we can look at the tank and kinda know whats wrong. But for most beginners we rely on tests. I found that most hobby tests are unreliable. Either my eyes are lame or the tests are lame, but probably both... and I am not happy with that Hanna tester either. When NO3 and PO4 tests show 0, its not. Its probably low, but not 0. |
12/08/2014, 09:21 PM | #36 | |
Reef and Coral Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lexington, Ky.
Posts: 1,739
|
Quote:
I'll second that. I know what parameters need adjusting just by looking at my reef. For example green film on the glass means my PO4 is elevated. I do test for ALK, I know that if my Alk is good then my calcium is ok also.
__________________
Chris Kirkland Reef Nerd. Current Tank Info: Getting back into the hobby. |
|
12/09/2014, 12:03 PM | #37 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,941
|
Quote:
UV is only useful for free swimming parasites in fish only tanks. Pointless otherwise, though plenty will dispute that opinion. I was just at one of the largest importers warehouse in L.A. a couple of weeks ago. The only systems using U.V. were for fish only. Ozone is simply overkill with today's skimmers. It will break down organics so that an inefficient skimmer will remove them but modern skimmers don't need that help. Yes, you water may look clearer, but that's because the organics are just smaller, not gone. Quote:
The Hanna is at least consitent and the reason you're getting a 0 reading is because the algae in your system are consuming the nitrates and phosphates before it accumulates in the water column. I too have Racemosa that grew out of rock unexpectedly. If you keep it under control it's a good means of export. If you haven't read this thread and have a few hours to kill it's worth the time. |
||
12/09/2014, 01:44 PM | #38 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
Chris... I rarely test Ca, if my alk is good my calcium is always within limits.
Reefvet - Stopping UV and Ozone is probably the most recent lesson I have learned. Your reasoning and how Zeoheads put it, "the added microorganisms and elements will be destroyed by its use" changed my thoughts. I assumed if they were destroying Zeo elements, they were probably able to destroy other elements. At first i did not want to part with my UV and Ozonator that I spent good hard cash for, but in the end i relented, and my tank improved. Also, if you are relying on GFO, you might have a balance issue with the tank. I also did come across that thread before. I found it compelling and tried following it, but there is a lot of technical information that I found overkill and eventually lost interest(I was a liberal arts major). The simple question of "where should I try to keep my levels at?" then going through a complicated discourse would make most hobbyist head hurt. The idea of not having to religiously chase numbers is good advice, but also too vague for many. There may indeed be a wide range of levels that home reefs can tolerate and even thrive at, but even that range has its limits. Moreover, we both already know that the balance will only come with patience; and that every tank is different. So when others ask the question, i always say natural sea levels of course, but if your corals look good and your reef is thriving, dont fix it. I guess my problem with Hanna was the clumsy powder pack. I just didnt like it and was never sure what was stuck inside the package. After being frustrated too many times, I decided on overkill and bought an EPA approved Colorimeter (SMART3) by LaMotte. It can test for everything you can think. Since using the Smart3, i have never had a reading of zero for anything. Its fun to use, but definitely not needed. |
12/09/2014, 02:13 PM | #39 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
This acro nursery is so much easier to maintain. I think part of the reason my colors are pretty good is that I can concentrate on just the acros. I do have fish, but they are of the "boring" variety... damsels and chromises with one clown somewhere in the refugium. In the past I have included anemones, LPS, zoos, exotic fish, etc. Although you can definitely have a thriving reef with everything mentioned, it just adds another level of variation that you must account for, which I eliminated.
By the way, that small yellow chromis is quite the nuisance. If not fed they get ****ed and start picking at polyps. But the blue damsel with the orange belly will eat hair algae. Its not in this photo. Last edited by maoiwowie; 12/09/2014 at 02:19 PM. |
12/09/2014, 04:03 PM | #40 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
"Hellfire" sold to me by FxdupCobra (RC Reefer) around 4/25/14
Today |
12/09/2014, 06:10 PM | #41 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,941
|
Very Nice Acro !
You're a perfect candidate for F.R.A.G this Saturday. Quote:
|
|
12/09/2014, 08:57 PM | #42 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
FRAG? Havent heard of it. I guess if I find the time ill venture out to Simi. Its about an hour out of LA. My problem is I am literally running out of room. I have 25 or so frags coming from BattleCorals soon that should have been here already. We got unlucky and the frags got stuck in Indiana. Adam at BC is a standup guy and we are working on replacing those frags as soon as the weather gets better.
I see the vendor list has Jrpdriver selling frags. I have several from him including the Purple tip and Hawkins i posted earlier. I also have several from Garret's Acropolis, that Shades of Fall. His outdoor system is incredible. Ill try to post where I got my frags from in future posts so you can get idea about lineage and a picture of what to expect because most of my frags are from members here. In case anyone is wondering the Rainbow Gran, Upscalles, Purple Passion, Pearlberry, and Plum Crazy are from Yariel0527. That Toxic Green is another from FxdupCobra. The Red Dragon and some pretty no-names I posted are from Ivan Orsonio. Yeah I originally was going to buy the one step up photometers from Hanna for the different tests reefers use, but once you add them up, it wasnt much cheaper than the Smart3. If you do some searching, you can find the Smart3 for much cheaper than suggested retail. |
12/10/2014, 10:51 AM | #43 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
The Boneyard... I have been posting all my most colorful frags, but everyone that keeps sps have a boneyard. If they tell you differently, they are floating on de nile. The boneyard is the resting place for all those frags that mysteriously RTNs or STNs... I have those too. I stopped trying to figure out why it happens, it just does. People post endlessly about perfect parameters and are manic about why some of their frags are wasting away. Well if your tank was truly balanced and there really wasnt a drastic change that happened, then let it go... it happens. Dont chase a few frags and screw with the balance. I find most losses occur within the first week of introduction, then a drop-off; but it can happen at anytime. My survival rate is about 80% overall. "Wild"(From chop shops) fresh cuts will obviously have a higher rate of death.
|
12/11/2014, 08:09 PM | #44 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 114
|
very true. all my sps frag growing well. out of no where overnite some sps frag die completely!!
Quote:
|
|
12/12/2014, 04:21 PM | #45 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
Alan... It happens to all of us that keep sps.
i want to share my experience with sps frags with STN. I used to be like many and chop them up to save them. I dont recall saving any to be honest. I cant argue with people that say it worked for them, but i do know that mysterious STN does not mean its a goner. I no longer chop them up, in fact i dont do a thing anymore. The following is a GARF Purple Bonsai i got from Garrets Acropolis back in March. This thing has been STN'ing since i got it. But as you can see from the pic, it stops and grows, then starts fresh again. A. Florida (Garrets) - another example of STN that suddenly stops. This one clearly has started to reverse. Oregon Tort (Garrets) - The STN decided to start mid frag... Then like the mystery of how it started, it stopped. Cant tell you why, but this is a slow grower and is recovering slowly. Blue Halo (Yariel0527) - Ive had this frag since mid-march too. It has grown maybe 1/4 inch. It is just starting to color up now, but 4 months ago it also decided to STN mid frag. But now it stopped as well and is recovering. Ive done nothing to address the STN in these frags except for patience. |
12/13/2014, 04:33 AM | #46 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 188
|
These are some great pictures, what sort of camera gear are you using? Any post-processing?
|
12/13/2014, 03:25 PM | #47 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
Thanks Crispy... I use a Sony A7 with a Macro lens on most shots. The camera has several settings and I struggle to get the white balance correct at times, but basically try to match my eyes with what I see on the camera screen. I shoot all the photos with all my lights on. I dont like the blue look that give corals an unnatural glow. Since all the corals are not permanently attached, I can position them anywhere, usually close to the top for overhead shots. With all the pumps off i dont need anything more to get focused shots.
|
12/13/2014, 11:47 PM | #48 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 47
|
I have the same story when it comes to stn. I use to freak out and try fragging off the "healthy" chunk but I've realized that if it's gonna go it's gonna go. I have a few frags that have done the same and stopped the stn and turned into healthy frags. I've thought about why but it's got to be a parameter of some sort whether it be water, flow or light.
|
12/14/2014, 01:53 AM | #49 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 621
|
This piece started to 'STN'. Then it looked like perhaps AEFW. But it turned out to be simply placed in direct flow of my Vortech.
After moving away from the Vortech, the piece quickly recovered. |
12/14/2014, 02:26 PM | #50 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: London
Posts: 102
|
Great thread and interesting about the stn. It does just sometimes happen
|
|
|