Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/17/2018, 06:57 AM   #1
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Alternative to GFO

Searching for a better alternative to GFO to maintain low PO4. Couple years back I used Phosguard, however I didn't see results. No surprise the market place is flooded with products for PO4 removal/maintenance.

Prefer to have something which can be run in a reactor.




__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 07:08 AM   #2
hegeh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 223
Can elaborate on didnot see result? Under recomended gfo ammount maybe?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk


hegeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 07:47 AM   #3
Jaffster
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 31
I've had great success using ATM Agent Green, there's plenty of other products also on the market that use Lanthanum Chloride.

It bonds to phosphate and creates small white beads. Though remember that this is an active way of removing PO4 rather than the passive method with GFO, so you'll need to keep on top of it.

I did read a few threads were people were also drip adding to their systems with good success.


Jaffster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 09:20 AM   #4
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by hegeh View Post
Can elaborate on didnot see result? Under recomended gfo ammount maybe?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
PO4 would steadily increase. Even when changing weekly (more frequently is not worth the $) an increase was still observed.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 09:22 AM   #5
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaffster View Post
I've had great success using ATM Agent Green, there's plenty of other products also on the market that use Lanthanum Chloride.

It bonds to phosphate and creates small white beads. Though remember that this is an active way of removing PO4 rather than the passive method with GFO, so you'll need to keep on top of it.

I did read a few threads were people were also drip adding to their systems with good success.
Looked into this as well and concluded that it is likely more complex and time consuming than I'm willing to commit to.

Hoping to get feedback on other bonding materials which can be run (and safely tumbled lightly) in a reactor.

How were you using the liquid Agent Green? In a sock?


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 09:36 AM   #6
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Thoughts/experiences with DrTim's NP-Active Pearls?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B006MP0JBW...detail_0?psc=1


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 10:30 AM   #7
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
GFO is a generic name for "granular ferric oxide".. There are different brands (Rowaphos,etc...) and quality covered under that..
Phosguard is a "granular aluminum oxide" product..
Lanthanum Chloride is another chemical used for phosphate binding.. More brands there..

However.. Those products ALL work when used correctly..
If its not working then something else is going on..

Of course I also personally feel that if you need phosphate binding products full time you are likely just overfeeding.. and if you can fix that you don't need the GFO,etc..
I have never needed any phosphate products ever..
The only 2 reasons I've seen for phosphate issues in this hobby are overfeeding and purchasing Pukani rock or similar rock with phosphate already bound in it..

Carbon dosing (pearls/vinegar/vodka/nopox,etc...) all do reduce phosphate but don't seem to be as effective as they are at reducing nitrate..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 10:42 AM   #8
reefgeezer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 2,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgyvr View Post
GFO is a generic name for "granular ferric oxide".. There are different brands (Rowaphos,etc...) and quality covered under that..
Phosguard is a "granular aluminum oxide" product..
Lanthanum Chloride is another chemical used for phosphate binding.. More brands there..

Carbon dosing (pearls/vinegar/vodka/nopox,etc...) all do reduce phosphate but don't seem to be as effective as they are at reducing nitrate..
+1 for all the above. Carbon dosing is simple to implement. You may find you need to add nitrate to enable the process to manage phosphate, but that's simple also. You can automate the process cheaply also.

You could turn reactor it into a Cheato Reactor. That'll help with phosphates. Size is usually a limiting factor though.


__________________
John,

Current Tank Info: In-process, 90 Gallon SPS Reef
reefgeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 11:00 AM   #9
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Always a good video when phosphate questions come up..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRIKW-9d2xI


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 02:37 PM   #10
hkgar
Registered Member
 
hkgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dewitt MI
Posts: 5,051
I over feed and my SPS love me for it. I do dose carbon (a 70/30 mix of vinegar/vodka at 40 ml/day) and do run GFO if PO4 creeps up above .05


__________________
Gary


180 gallon, 40 gallon sump, 3 250 W MH + 4 80W ATI T5's, MTC MVX 36 Skimmer, Apex controller Aquamaxx T-3 CaRx

Current Tank Info: A 2 Barred Rabbitfish, Red Head Salon, Yellow/Purple, McMaster Fairy, Possum, 2 Leopard Wrasses, Kole, & Atlantic Blue Tangs, 2 Percula Clown, 3 PJ and 1 Banggai Cardinalfish , Swallowtail, Bellus and Coral Beauty Angels
hkgar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 03:07 PM   #11
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
PhosGuard will work, if enough is used, but it will release some aluminum, which sometimes seems to cause problems. GFO seems to be fine. How high is the phosphate level? GFO (and PhosGuard) can be exhausted in a few hours if the GFO level is very high at all.

For a 90g reef, I might start with ¼ cup or less, depending on the phosphate level, but I am fairly cautious.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 05:09 PM   #12
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
It was 0.45 when I put GFO back in to reduce it. I do feed slightly heavy, mostly to keep a few fish from nipping at the coral.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 06:18 PM   #13
hegeh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 223
Using GFO in reactor? Never heard gfo did not do its work.. mine was half the recomended ratio and its too effective.. rowaPhos is very good imo

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk


hegeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 09:49 PM   #14
LobsterOfJustice
Recovering Detritophobe
 
LobsterOfJustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 7,443
Am I the only one wondering why OP wants something that is run like GFO and does the same thing as GFO, but isn’t GFO?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


__________________
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.

I remember when zoanthids were called things like "green" and "orange" and not "reverse gorilla nipple."

Current Tank Info: 180g reef with all the bells and whistles
LobsterOfJustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/17/2018, 10:21 PM   #15
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
I would expect the media to be exhausted in a few hours if run in a reactor. That level is fairly high.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 07:11 AM   #16
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by LobsterOfJustice View Post
Am I the only one wondering why OP wants something that is run like GFO and does the same thing as GFO, but isn’t GFO?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertoni View Post
I would expect the media to be exhausted in a few hours if run in a reactor. That level is fairly high.
Exactly why I am searching for a media (similar to GFO) which does not exhaust so quickly and strip so much PO4.

As in the original post the question I posed was a similar type media for maintenance.

At this point going to use a small amount of GFO 24/7 for a while since I am seeing good results.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 08:16 AM   #17
homer1475
Registered Member
 
homer1475's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 5,313
Might want to try some high capacity GFO from BRS. While it's still GFO, it can absorb a lot more then regular old GFO and won't be exhausted so quickly. I had good results with the HC GFO when regular GFO was being exhausted so quickly when I had a PO4 issue.



Only caveat is it's a bit more expensive.


__________________
80G SCA Build: http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2560256

Originally posted by der_wille_zur_macht:

"He's just taking his lunch to work"
homer1475 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 08:19 AM   #18
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
If you want it to work "slower" just run it in a media bag and not in a reactor..
That way you can continue to feed heavily and continue to maintain your current level..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 08:42 AM   #19
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by homer1475 View Post
Might want to try some high capacity GFO from BRS. While it's still GFO, it can absorb a lot more then regular old GFO and won't be exhausted so quickly. I had good results with the HC GFO when regular GFO was being exhausted so quickly when I had a PO4 issue.



Only caveat is it's a bit more expensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgyvr View Post
If you want it to work "slower" just run it in a media bag and not in a reactor..
That way you can continue to feed heavily and continue to maintain your current level..
Thx will look into both of these options.

Finally what is the negative to running GFO (in small amounts) 24/7 if any?


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 09:09 AM   #20
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobZilla04 View Post
Thx will look into both of these options.

Finally what is the negative to running GFO (in small amounts) 24/7 if any?
Its going to be exhausted quickly and then just useless sitting there..

Its basically a sponge in a puddle.. It fills up to what it can take then you just have a wet sponge in a puddle..

IMO...Identify/stop the reason for the elevated phosphate then use GFO to drop it and then discontinue GFO.
I personally don't understand why people run it long term..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 09:18 AM   #21
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgyvr View Post
Its going to be exhausted quickly and then just useless sitting there..

Its basically a sponge in a puddle.. It fills up to what it can take then you just have a wet sponge in a puddle..

IMO...Identify/stop the reason for the elevated phosphate then use GFO to drop it and then discontinue GFO.
I personally don't understand why people run it long term..
My reason is probably similar to most if not all others: feeding. I know I overfeed (slightly or moderately).

I have a pair of damsels which pick at birdsnest coral. The way to eliminate this is to make sure they are full and happy. Additionally I tend to leave monthly for at least a few days during which time the fish are unfed. Overfeeding during the week compensates.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 09:21 AM   #22
reefgeezer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 2,621
It is possible to regenerate GFO. It's a PIA but cuts expenses.


__________________
John,

Current Tank Info: In-process, 90 Gallon SPS Reef
reefgeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 11:35 AM   #23
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobZilla04 View Post
I have a pair of damsels which pick at birdsnest coral. The way to eliminate this is to make sure they are full and happy.
Nothing like needing to pay for GFO and excessive food for a few dollars in fish..
Flush them and problem solved..
Its damsels man.. Dime a dozen.. Solve the problem..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 11:50 AM   #24
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgyvr View Post
Nothing like needing to pay for GFO and excessive food for a few dollars in fish..
Flush them and problem solved..
Its damsels man.. Dime a dozen.. Solve the problem..
If catching them was only that easy. Guess a fish trap would solve that problem.

Six months or so ago I destroyed half my scape to remove one of them. That effort took a week to accomplish and weeks more to rescape/recover.

Not to mention I'd still have excess nutrients just from the bio load, even if I removed two small damsels.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2018, 12:08 PM   #25
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobZilla04 View Post
Not to mention I'd still have excess nutrients just from the bio load, even if I removed two small damsels.
And a single shot of GFO will take care of that right after you stop overfeeding

Or if you are having both nitrate and phosphate issues then try carbon dosing if you aren't already.. That will drop both..
I'd recommend vinegar or vodka vs biopellets.. Liquid is just so much easier/faster,etc...


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.