Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 08/27/2015, 07:34 PM   #26
mystikal
Registered Member
 
mystikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Apopka-Orlando, Florida
Posts: 611
Wow

Hey idea for the noise on the pvc and wood...you might want to try adding some 3m tape in between the brackets and wood, or use dynomat. It's used for stereo systems and prevents noise for emmenating.
I personally would feel comfortable with the pvc pipes secured, instead of hanging freely.

Keep up the good work!


mystikal is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/28/2015, 12:39 PM   #27
KRBNSOL
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 111
Wow - what a project! Keep the updates coming. Great Job!


__________________
"Never time to do it right - but there's always time to do it over"

Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef/30g sump
KRBNSOL is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/28/2015, 01:33 PM   #28
davehead86
Registered Member
 
davehead86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Monticello, IL
Posts: 819
I am so envious / jealous. Great thread!


davehead86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/29/2015, 10:20 AM   #29
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Thanks mystical, KRBNSOL and davehead86.

I am at a minor impasse and could use some ideas. While I was in PT, I did a lot of reading both on RC and TRT. Man there are some great theory meets experience threads between those two sites. Three things interested me in particular because I want to combine large messy eaters with low nutrient corals on the same system. That leaves one solution, really cleaning up after the bigger poopers.

(1) DSB.
(2) BB.
(3) Lots & lots of LR.

I like sand. Sand brings a look that is very satisfying. I ran a SSB in this tank previously and diligently vacuumed it regularly. However, a DSB is attractive as a stabilizing processor of nitrates and sink for phosphates. It just needs proper maintenance to avoid the 5 saturation and dreaded crash. So here's is my way overboard filtration idea...

First, "Sea Monsters" becomes "Pandemonium" and gets an arrangement of Fiji base rock just provide a few territorial markers and depth. Then, its gets a layer of 1-2 inches black sand. This will make vacuuming very easy and it's right next to a bathroom to dump the waste water. This tank will be based on overstocking semi-aggressive fish (like discus). If two dwarf angels will fight until one fatigues and dies, eight will constantly be watching their own backs rather than bully anyone else.

Second, "Coral Country" gets a white HDPE base caulked into the bottom and either faux or bare bottom. A little sand constantly being blown to the front (and moving wastes into the water column) gives the quick view appearance of sand before the amazing corals swoon the viewer. The rock in this tank will be almost exclusively Pukani giving the best chances for keeping multiple mandarins.

Third, "Sanctuary" gets replaced by the 120 gallon and filled with any left over rock creating a massive LR filter. The rock will be elevated from the bottom of the tank allowing bacteria flock and phosphate precipitates to be blown from underneath BB style. On top, I put egg crate to make a 4'x2' fragging tank.

So the lots & lots of LR and BB experiments are taken care of. Now for the DSB or more specifically remote DSB. I've thought this was a great experiment for awhile now. I plumb the rubbermade holding tank, that I am now using to cook rock, into the system with very low flow. I make dividers to create 4 different sections and fill each section will all the sand that isn't going back into the tanks. After year 1, I clean the sand in bed number one then leave it in these to start over. I move through the other sections, cleaning a year 2, 3, and 4 sequentially. Maybe I get nitrate reduction without the 5 year crash because no section gets more than 4 years out but I get stability because of the additional years in the tank.

(1) rDSB
(2) BB
(3) Lots & lots of LR.

And my compulsive need to over engineer in order to entertain myself.
__________________
Jason

Single system called Pandora Too of three tanks:
• Pandemonium: 92 gal corner Softies/FOWLR on fish overload (office)
• Coral Country: 150X gal LPS (&SPS?) (family room)
• Sanctuary: 120 gal REFUGIUM (50% chaeto/50% all dark bacterial LR) (fish/man cave)
• Filtration: 60 gal sump, 35 gal settling tank?, DSB?

• Serenity: FW105 gal Discus (bedroom)

"Physics is a b!tch. She's always right no matter how sure you were about your plumbing design." Me, standing in a puddle of water...

"You cannot allow [yourself] to avoid the brutal facts. If [you] start living in a dream world, it's going to be bad." General "Mad Dog” Mattis.



Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 11:37 AM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/29/2015, 10:39 AM   #30
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
I forgot my QUESTION!

I was thinking of using PVC snap on pipe tees to create supports to hold up the egg crate in the LR filter. Those are very effective at allowing the bacteria flock to be blown away rather than trapped in the space below the LR. However, I am concerned that no matter how many of these I use support the egg crate, 12+ inches are going to crush through somewhere where it is not supported. The egg crate should be great for the frag shelf but that is on top. The bottom level needs to be open to allow flow to push the flock & phosphates to the overflows. They are mega flows, so the have inlets top and bottom. I will drill out the bottom of the overflows to create maximum flow there rather than over the top.

I need confirmation that the egg crate should stand up, suggestions on something else to do the job, or general improvements for this LR filter/frag tank.

Thanks!



Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 10:31 AM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/01/2015, 07:22 PM   #31
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
So here is a mock up. I used 1.5FS T-fittings which I cut in have with a chop saw. Here is one finished and one ready to flip to the other side. The idea is the open single are of the T-fitting allows debris, flock to sink to the bottom space. The half circles of the cut section of T-fittings will allow debris, flock to be blown to where the overflows can pull it continuously into the sump & skimmer.





From there, I arranged them on a 4x2 pattern to void any spacing gaps of greater than 12". Connecting these T-fittings are fiberglass rods 3/8 in diameter. I found them for $1.50 a piece in the scrap pile at Rural King...I bought everyone I could find. These connect the T-fittings, keep the T-fittings spaced, provide 1.5" diameter support to the egg crate and provide longer lengths of support.





I am still worried about breaking through the egg crate with hundreds of pound of rock but at least this seem worth prototyping. What could go wrong?



Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 11:21 AM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/07/2015, 09:00 PM   #32
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Rule #1 is in serious danger...



OMG!! Sixty gallon inductor tank. It could...
(1) Serve as the settling tank. Even strong flow into that volume of water would allow settling to occur.
(2) Replace my 65 gallon drum of dead volume.
(3) Allows a tank that could be isolated for up to 60 gallon water changes.

Is any of this serving to justify breaking Rule #1? I will need a convincing argument to sell the wife.



Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 11:30 AM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/08/2015, 08:49 AM   #33
Reefin' Dude
Registered Member
 
Reefin' Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 739
Wow, lots of stuff going on here!!

of course i like the settling tank idea. my settling tank is working fairly well. i am still working on ways to keep the detritus from "sticking" to the HDPE on the sides. i have a wiper that is made out of acrylic, velcro, and an old algae magnet that a sweep the sides of the conical part a few minutes before doing a water change out of the settling tank. it works ok, but i think it could be better. this is on a 30g settling tank, so something like this is going to be a must on a 60g settling tank where the height is problematic. you will probably need powerheads in the top part of the settling tank to encourage settling in the lower areas. using egg crate as a flow divider works great for this at the top of the conical section.

trying to read through all of the thread. are you still trying to get all of the tanks fed and returned to the same sump? i think you might want to think about cascading some of the systems into others, then finally into the sump/settling tank/live sump. with the "cleanest" water being sent back to the SPS system.

G~


__________________
Friends don't let friends use refugiums.

Current Tank Info: Not dead yet.
Reefin' Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/08/2015, 10:34 AM   #34
nuxx
RC Sponsor
 
nuxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 3,990
Looking great!


__________________
Peter

TankStop - Fish and Coral

470G Display - Build Thread

Current Tank Info: Retired - 470 Gallon Mixed Reef (120x29x31")
nuxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/08/2015, 07:34 PM   #35
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
G~ thanks for looking.
nuxx - thanks very much!

So the egg crate is intended to dampen circulation transfer from the upper portion to the conical portion? I have been considering flow patterns in the settling tank. I believe the standard is entering about 20% above the cone and overflowing at the top allowing the huge increase in diameter to slow the velocity of the flow.

First, is the height too much for the value of effective settling? I am somewhat concerned that with some much plumbing length and interior surfaces that "grabbing" or accumulation on the inner surfaces will counterproductively create nitrate producing surfaces before detritus gets to the skimmer/ST.

I have been considering the dynamics of two alternatives.
(1) A vertical drop in a standpipe at the center of the ST. The bottom of the standpipe (say 4") would impact a diffuser plate (an 6" cap with the opening facing upward) glued to the bottom with spacers so that the flow immediately reverses direction. This would hopefully provide a lower velocity albeit more turbulent input to the tank.
(2) Angling the inflow in the standard configuration to hug the tank wall, this would (?) prevent accumulation on the walls and allow the detritus that enters the center region of the tank to fall in a more laminar region.

I am still trying to tie one system together. I recognize the challenges better now of high nutrient ("lagoon") parameters reefs that will be more happy with big waste producers versus low nutrient ("reef crest") parameters for the SPS/LPS. However, my maintenance routines are poorer so monitoring and maintenance of one system and a little higher reliance on water changes seems a better match to my habits.


mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/08/2015, 09:45 PM   #36
MrClownReef
Registered Member
 
MrClownReef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 122
Looks great! Keep up the good work!


MrClownReef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/09/2015, 08:15 AM   #37
Reefin' Dude
Registered Member
 
Reefin' Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 739
correct the egg crate is to dampen the flow. i needed the egg crate in my current CST to hold up the devices in the CST. i have the inlet coming in under the egg crate directly from the skimmer. i have an elbow on the skimmer outlet to create a circular current along the edge of the cone. the outlet of the CST as close to the center as i could. in my case it is not very close to the center because the skimmer itself is in the way.

for the larger system i will be looking for the widest cone tank that would fit in my area. i would like it short, rather than tall. to get the flow working for me, i will look into those MaxSpect Gyre's. turning one on its side to keep the flow laminar around the edge of the cone tank to keep the detritus from being able to stick to the HDPE.

here is a drawing of how my CST is setup if you did not see it in my build thread. this is a very cramped "sump". when i go bigger i will not be doing it all in one device unless i can find a very large diameter CST. wider is definitely better than taller. if there is room available.



the way it looks.



picture of the cleaning wand.



HTH,

G~


__________________
Friends don't let friends use refugiums.

Current Tank Info: Not dead yet.
Reefin' Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/09/2015, 07:21 PM   #38
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Thanks MCR and G~.

That's a bunch of ideas on the CST (conical settling tank?). If you can, give your build thread a shameless plug here (i.e.- what's the link because I am lazy?). There is more to that CST than a quick sidebar gives credit.

I believe the reference to the outlet of the skimmer indicates that it goes below the grate. Why? I would think we want to discourage flow of clean water into that area.

Would the Gyre be worth the expense versus using a T-fitting and making a spray bar?

Given the same footprint, I was considering that more vertical would give a better return (i.e. 60 versus 35 gallon). Is the thought that the larger diameter would provide better settling (more stagnant flow region)? Or is it because of the space available for cross purposing it as a sump? I have a ton of basement space versus the limited footprint of the stands.


mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/09/2015, 08:52 PM   #39
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
So here is the update for today.

The modified T-fittings were drilled at the bottom of the slip neck so that the 3/8" rods lie in the slots and the fitting top/rod are flush with the bottom of the egg crate.

Will it hold? LET'S FIND OUT!! I piled dry Fiji rock on top of the egg crate. The result was surprisingly sturdy. So I piled some more.





I am contemplating adding another row of fittings & a rod and omitting the front to back rods that I was considering adding. That would eliminate the rod-over-rod difference in height.

I also noted that some rock fragments still fell through the egg crate so I will need to leave an opening and have a method for removing these which will otherwise defeat the easy flow of flock to the overflows.



Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 11:33 AM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/10/2015, 08:13 AM   #40
Reefin' Dude
Registered Member
 
Reefin' Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by mvsjrs View Post
Thanks MCR and G~.

That's a bunch of ideas on the CST (conical settling tank?). If you can, give your build thread a shameless plug here (i.e.- what's the link because I am lazy?). There is more to that CST than a quick sidebar gives credit.
correct, conical settling tank. shameless plug.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mvsjrs View Post
I believe the reference to the outlet of the skimmer indicates that it goes below the grate. Why? I would think we want to discourage flow of clean water into that area.
i put the outlet below the great because i wanted any of the big stuff that may have made it through the skimmer to immediately fall to the bottom and not get stuck on the grate. is it necessary, not sure. i may take off the extra pipe and let the skimmer just dump into the CST above the grate. having the outlet below the grate was the original plan when the CST was going to go directly after the overflow and before anything else. i wanted any larger pieces of detritus to fall out of suspension without the risk of getting trapped on the egg crate. with the CST now after the UV and the skimmer it may not be necessary and like i mentioned earlier i may change the plan.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mvsjrs View Post
Would the Gyre be worth the expense versus using a T-fitting and making a spray bar?
not sure how a T fitting would work the same as a Gyre, but a 90 elbow would. depending on the amount of flow from the inlet the elbow may be enough, but doubt it from what i am seeing in my CST. i am planning on adding another propeller PH into the CST to increase the flow around the edge to keep the sticking of detritus to the HDPE down even more. watching the demos from MACNA, the Gyre's create a pretty tight laminar flow. it should work very well for this purpose. keeping the flow to the outside edge of the CST, while keeping the center slow in flow to allow settling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mvsjrs View Post
Given the same footprint, I was considering that more vertical would give a better return (i.e. 60 versus 35 gallon). Is the thought that the larger diameter would provide better settling (more stagnant flow region)? Or is it because of the space available for cross purposing it as a sump? I have a ton of basement space versus the limited footprint of the stands.
the thinner the settling tank the harder it is to get the flow in the center slower. the bigger the volume the better, but it is the total cross section of the tank that determines the velocity of water through the entire device. the tighter you can get the high velocity flow around the edges the better. if one can get a nice laminar flow along the edge that quickly drops off towards the center, than a taller thinner CST will work just fine.

i am playing around with making the CST also a sump. my original plan when i got the CST for the old tank was to use it just as a settling tank, nothing else in it. siphoning sumps of detritus can be a pain. i was giving a settling sump a try here. i just happen to have my old CST so i decided to give this a try instead of creating a sump with a V shaped bottom and a valve.

G~


__________________
Friends don't let friends use refugiums.

Current Tank Info: Not dead yet.
Reefin' Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/13/2015, 08:48 PM   #41
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Thanks G~. I will give that some thought as I prototype designs.

Good weekend of progress (i.e.- some progress was made).

To encourage flow of bacterial flock out of the bottom of the LR tank I used a Dremel tool to enlarge the "mega flow" overflow weirs. There was also obviously a lot "cruddation" inside the overflow. I will need to blast it clean since it is probably pure phosphate and nitrate slug. I also added a fourth row of support for the egg crate grate.







On another front, look at the little cutie I found scampering through the grass...



Unfortunately, the little b@$t@rd'$ mother has been ravaging the pond fish. A little chicken and bam! Funniest thing, this was the second largest snapping turtle taken from the pond. The first was taken from the roof with an AR-15 and still managed to crawl to a secluded spot and stink us out for a month.





Thank goodness she wasn't a mutant hitchhiker in some live rock....



Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 05:24 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/13/2015, 10:15 PM   #42
Bent
I got nothin'
 
Bent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The anals
Posts: 6,420
We have some enormous snapping turtles around here that look like the spawn of satan....

Looks like yours, only spikey and hissey and ultra mean. Tried to move one out of the road once that was blocking the entire lane. It bit a 2x4 in half.


__________________
Quitters never lose.

[QUOTE=CStrickland]Who gets mad at a starfish?[/QUOTE]

Current Tank Info: 75g DT, 30G refugium, 10g chaeto tank, 50g stock tank basement sump
Bent is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/29/2015, 08:19 PM   #43
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Baby steps, but the holes for the overflows are cut. I started just hugging the shape necessary for the bulkheads but just spent time busting my knuckles in the tight space. Then I opened the holes to full size of the corner overflows and the bulkheads went in like bud-a (butter). Sometimes you just outthink yourself.







Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 12:09 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/29/2015, 08:20 PM   #44
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Today the test rock went into the 120 to test the fiberglass rods and egg crate.





Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 12:11 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/05/2015, 08:02 PM   #45
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Water and Circulation!! And in only 6 months!







Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 12:34 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/11/2015, 06:42 PM   #46
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
I snuck it in in the last picture, but I broken Rule #1 again. Bought a Reef Octopus Super Skimmer RO-PS-2000INT from a friend getting out of the hobby after many years. Italian, raspy voice: "I'll make you a deal you can't refuse." Our friends at marinedepot.com say the following:

The Reef Octopus RO-PS-2000INT Protein Skimmer offers the very pinnacle of in-sump protein skimmer for aquariums up to a 200 gallons. All the latest skimmer design innovations can be found on this RO-PS-2000INT model.
•For aquariums up to 200 gallons
•Pump: Bubble Blaster HY-2000 pinwheel pump—offers super efficiency and the very best in performance. The Bubble Blaster is designed to enhance filtration by employing the innovative pinwheel impeller which delivers more bubbles in greater volume with low energy consumption and heat emission.
•Footprint: 12.6″ x 8.7″ | Body Diameter: 6″ | Height: 22″
•Installation: Sump
•Bubble Diffusing Chamber and Hybrid Cone Body that naturally reduces and stabilizes the foam production; This means less turbulence in the neck area and more contact time for organics to rise and collect
•Oversized air silencer for quiet operation and airline mount
•Large collection cup with flow directional guide, drain and unit venting
•Precision control with the easy to turn output flow valve
•Max injection venturi air injection system
•Precision water level control output valve
•Output Size: 40mm - Comes with metric to British adapter to 1.25”pvc
•Output Height: 7.5″
•Recommended Sump Water Depth: 6" to 6.5"
•Solid acrylic construction


mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/11/2015, 06:49 PM   #47
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Here is the skimmer output overnight. It took several days of setup...sleep...adjust...work...adjust...to get the skimmer in the right depth and back pressure. I was really thrown off by setting the skimmer and coming back to find it overflowing violently. Now the sump does not have baffles yet so the depth is variable due to evaporation but not 8-12 hours is a little short to throw the skimmer that out of whack. then again, actual experience says differently. D@mn data!





Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 12:36 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/11/2015, 06:59 PM   #48
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Another two snapping turtles again this weekend. If I could sell the meat, it might add up to a couple corals...hum.




Funniest thing...my wife used all 12 shots of a .22 wheel gun and just pi$$ed off the big one to no end. Evidently proof that you cannot be killed by a wife's nagging. Mercifully, The date was ended with a .45.

A little smaller catch must be Misses.




Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 05:21 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/11/2015, 07:22 PM   #49
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
This is my detritus and stuff blaster that I have been using to clean my rock. It does a nice job but it is still quite limiting not to be able to siphon the bottom directly.



I've been doing a lot of reading to get caught up on the latest in live rock preparation. It seems to me that there are three terms that are really more specific than normally used. I imagine that this is open to many opinions and nuances. But these are the assumptions behind my decisions.

(1) Cycling - Getting the live rock and getting past a brief ammonia/ammonium rich period. Just like setting up any tank to get the bacterial filtration process started.
(2) Curing - A longer process external to your DT intended to rid the dead material on the LR. Allows the shipping damage and incompatible bio-critters to die off given your water, your routine.
(3) Cooking - A significantly longer version of curing that has two phases. First, tradition curing processes occur. Second, and more importantly for the long term, the bacterial processes are allow to process phosphates that have accumulated in the rock. Dry rock mined from ancient reefs or cultured live rock from lagoons, the phosphates have just lurking in the rock ready to blow away nitrate problems and plunge right into tanks crashing.

Now, all my rock has been pulled from other tanks that people have been selling. My older stuff was a couple years old before the great disaster.The last tank I bought used was a DSB that was literally grey sludge from about 5mm down. In fact, when I got it home and started cleaning, there were inches of the sludge in the bottom of the overflows. So I am willing to guess that any phosphate buffering capability has long since been lost.



Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 12:52 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10/11/2015, 07:31 PM   #50
mvsjrs
Registered Member
 
mvsjrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 162
Detritus removal experimenting time. I used my handy, dandy Mag5 blaster and placed a 1" riser in the back corner of the tank. I then tried blowing the detritus toward the pipe while under full siphon.



The results were less than spectacular. The egg crate dampened the flow through it unless the blaster was almost completely vertical. Further, where I had placed rock to simulate "blow through" flow, the flow was pointless after being deflected in so many directions by the rock. The detritus would be blown away in a circle that could not be directed toward the pipe. The final results after significant time and effort looked like the following:





Last edited by mvsjrs; 03/29/2018 at 12:53 PM.
mvsjrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cone

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.