|
12/21/2006, 01:13 AM | #76 | |
Cuby2k
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 982
|
Quote:
AND . . . I own this page. A first for me. I have found it is the simple things in life . . .
__________________
Rod "Cuby" Current Tank Info: 180 display, 100 gal DIY fuge/sump, DIY skimmer. |
|
12/21/2006, 05:21 AM | #77 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lake Tomahawk WI
Posts: 24
|
Ok hope this works.. first time posting pics here. My first DIY dual beckett skimmer, inspired by your monster skimmer thread. I am running this with a hammerhead pump and like the way it skims
|
12/21/2006, 05:36 AM | #78 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lake Tomahawk WI
Posts: 24
|
Pics of it running
|
12/21/2006, 08:35 AM | #79 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,252
|
I have been following both threads, as I have been making plans to build a skimmer similar to the one in Zeph's original "monster beckett" thread. I have a 180 gallon tank(reef - sps), that I will have heavily stocked, which will have around 250-280 total system gallons. I am going to have a refugium and a prop tank for it, included in this volume. You stated that your original monster beckett would be sufficient for up to a 500 gal. system. How would it fare on my planned set up? Should I make plans for a larger skimmer?
Nate
__________________
My skimmate has notes of saffron, and a hint of lilac. |
12/21/2006, 09:01 AM | #80 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,772
|
Always gotta add the wife to the tall skimmer photos. I tried, but did not get full cooperation. I asked for a smile and the Vanna look... and instead got a frown and a "be happy with what you got" comment.
My question would to those who have used these monsters and modern NW monsters.. do you guys feel the beckett is still viable? IE is the increased power consumption efficient in terms of increased skimming over the NW designs? Bean |
12/21/2006, 10:33 AM | #81 |
Cuby2k
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 982
|
I'll add my 2 cents Bean. My skimmer is a combo unit with a beckett head and a NW pump as well. (I'll post a pic in a minute) For the power consumption I think the NW beats the beckett hands down as far as skimming capacity. I see no reason why a NW pump couldn't be used in addition to a taller main tower and then a smaller recirc pump used to return water to the sump (I prefer the out of sump design)
I wish I had a kw meter to get some actual numbers but I am pretty sure my Iwaki 70 is a power hog.
__________________
Rod "Cuby" Current Tank Info: 180 display, 100 gal DIY fuge/sump, DIY skimmer. |
12/21/2006, 10:43 AM | #82 |
Cuby2k
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 982
|
Let me qualify the picture here; ahem. My FIRST attempt with acrylic work AND my first attempt at a skimmer. One year ago today I hardly knew what a skimmer was so from the time I first put this little baby together to the present picture it has undergone a few ghetto type transitions.
Anyway in the front is the NW pump and to the right you can see the beckett head and enclosure. I don't mean to take away from its effectiveness, the thing churns dark butter but we all want the most cost effective and energy efficient system we can get I think.
__________________
Rod "Cuby" Current Tank Info: 180 display, 100 gal DIY fuge/sump, DIY skimmer. |
12/21/2006, 11:27 AM | #83 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,772
|
is that a drip cup under that union... hehe
|
12/21/2006, 02:00 PM | #84 | |
Cuby2k
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 982
|
Quote:
As it turns out, I may want to install a PAN under the entire assembly.
__________________
Rod "Cuby" Current Tank Info: 180 display, 100 gal DIY fuge/sump, DIY skimmer. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|