|
09/28/2016, 04:48 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 125
|
How long to go Fallow?
So I've set up my new tank, and I put a bunch of corals in from a swap, so I have things from a bunch of different reefers from hobbyist to commercial. I also have gotten a new fish that has been kept in a separate tank up until now. I want to do my best with quarantine procedures for this new tank. How long do I have to keep the fish out of the DT to ensure that any parasites that hitchhiked on the corals will have died out?
Fish will be receiving 2 rounds of prazipro, and likely TTM in the meantime. Is there anything else I ought to do? Fish appears to be in good health or is asymptomatic. |
09/28/2016, 05:20 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 180
|
Taking it into regard from someone brand new in this but from what I have read, DT stays fallow for 72 days (minimum) after ANYTHING other than a QT'd fish goes in. That includes corals and inverts. I'm in the process as we speak. I am sure someone with more experience will post.
Happy Reefing!
__________________
Regards, Ron Current Tank Info: 120 Gallon long reef tank, 75 gallon basement sump/fuge, GHL 3.1T ex controller, GHL Doser 2.1, BRS dual GFO/Carbon, Rapid Led's |
09/28/2016, 06:16 PM | #3 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,191
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris Hope is not a strategy. Display Tank: DSA 105 w/36gal sump/fuge · 2x MP40wES PHs · 2x Radion Gen2 · Apex w/PM2 · Fish · Corals · Rock · Sand · Water |
|
09/28/2016, 08:24 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 125
|
Yeesh. Was hoping for something closer to a month. As always I assume its an all or nothing proposition? Either I'm sure its gone, or I'm sure its there?
|
09/29/2016, 02:05 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 9,555
|
72 days is only the longest observed duration of a cyst - you still have to add a day or two for the hatched infective stages.
So the minimum fallow based on this should be 74 days. Though if you go that long you may as well do 3 full months - keep in mind that this was a single observation of a single strain. There is no warranty that a cyst can't hold out longer.
__________________
Pairs: 4 percula, 3 P. kauderni, 3 D. excisus, 1 ea of P. diacanthus, S. splendidus, C. altivelis O. rosenblatti, D. janssi, S. yasha & a Gramma loreto trio 3 P. diacanthus. 2 C. starcki Current Tank Info: 200 gal 4 tank system (40x28x24 + 40B + 40B sump tank + 20g refugium) + 30x18x18 mixed reef + 20g East Pacific biotop + 20g FW +... |
09/29/2016, 11:21 AM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 125
|
So where does the 72 day figure come from? I've been doing some searches through my university's system and I'm not really finding a whole lot of specific details about the cyst stage.
|
09/29/2016, 11:51 AM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 1,404
|
Interesting.. I usually see people cite this study for the 72 day window
http://www.int-res.com/articles/dao/1/d001p019.pdf but.. I read it says 28 days is maximum... must have been from a different study. I seem to remember reading it before, and it was done by keeping it at something like 52 degrees... the ones kept at normal aquarium temps all hatched much sooner... and even to achieve 25-28 days they kept it at low salinity. just keep in mind the time/money/fish lives you could lose if you decide to shorten it though. I'll be doing a 90 day fallow period on my currently ich infected tanks. patience is very inexpensive...
__________________
300 gallon 8ft long, 2x xf250 gyre, reef octopus 250-int - work in progress Aquarist since 1986 Last edited by Mishri; 09/29/2016 at 12:02 PM. |
09/29/2016, 12:27 PM | #8 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 125
|
Quote:
Hmm. Interesting. I'm all for doing the job right, but there's a difference between doing it right and doing 3x as much for no reason. The articles I've read so far mostly deal with vaccination and protocols for keeping infections to a minimum in mariculture facilities. I don't want to disparage the experts or anything, but like many things both in and out of the hobby it might be a case of 'so and so said to so thats what I do..." ad infinitum. |
|
09/29/2016, 12:57 PM | #9 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,191
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris Hope is not a strategy. Display Tank: DSA 105 w/36gal sump/fuge · 2x MP40wES PHs · 2x Radion Gen2 · Apex w/PM2 · Fish · Corals · Rock · Sand · Water |
|
09/29/2016, 12:59 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 1,404
|
This one has a bunch of studies cited you could read through:
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fa164 this is cited frequently.. for data on ich I think that link Is the one you are referencing Deinonych edit: maybe it isn't.. I can't find the section which would have that info in it.. I think it still says 21 days on that one.. but I know someone did link me to a study that had the 72 day observation in it.. because nobody else could find that info either.. this has been discussed before as I wanted that info as well. The thing I still had a problem with though was the temp was so cold to keep it as a tomont/cyst stage longer intentionally... so it isn't what we would observe under normal reef aquarium conditions. But, there are new strains being discovered and one that can survive hypo so... things are getting tough. I doubt that any strains are developing longer rather than shorter tomont duration though.. I can't imagine the benefit for it. edit again: this should hit a pdf: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/bitstre...PDF?sequence=1
__________________
300 gallon 8ft long, 2x xf250 gyre, reef octopus 250-int - work in progress Aquarist since 1986 Last edited by Mishri; 09/29/2016 at 01:13 PM. |
09/29/2016, 01:46 PM | #11 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,191
|
Quote:
The University of Florida one you mentioned above is also very good as it provides all the pertinent information about Cryptocaryon in one place (and in relatively lay language).
__________________
Chris Hope is not a strategy. Display Tank: DSA 105 w/36gal sump/fuge · 2x MP40wES PHs · 2x Radion Gen2 · Apex w/PM2 · Fish · Corals · Rock · Sand · Water |
|
09/29/2016, 03:06 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 492
|
72 days worked for me.
|
09/29/2016, 09:29 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 11
|
I am currently in the midst of a fallow period in my DT for velvet, so I have just done a bunch of research on fallow periods myself. The advice above is absolutely sound, but I will offer a different way of looking at things.
This is an odds game, and on multiple levels. The odds that your new livestock was infested, the odds that it is infested with ich vs velvet (shorter life cycle) vs something else, and the odds that it is a long-lived tomont strain of whatever the hypothetical infestation may be. So it more boils down to your comfort level and how risk-averse you are. Go 72-74 days, and you're pretty much guaranteed a parasite-free tank. That will cover the longest-lived strains of the longest-lived saltwater parasites under water conditions that are conducive to longevity of parasites. However, many people will green light new livestock for the DT after only 4 asymptomatic weeks in a QT. For that matter, many people don't QT at all and get lucky most of the time, but that is not good husbandry. I need to dig up the source, but I saw one article that said something like 84% chance of being parasite-free at 4 weeks fallow, 97ish % at 6 weeks, and 99.7% at 8 weeks. Can't remember where or in reference to what though, but my gut is telling me that was for marine ich. The data is out there (and referenced in the posts above). You have to decide what level of risk, if any, suits you. |
09/29/2016, 10:28 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 9,555
|
... and only 4 weeks worked for me... (with 4 fully immune fish still in the tank) - no new fish ever got it.
The tomonts of most ich strains will likely be excysted after the 28 days as stated in the above linked Colorni study. The 72 days go back to one single observation in one single study among several research studies done on Cryptocaryon. From hearsay here, this was also under rather fringe conditions (rather low temperature). Based on that it is nearly impossible to claim that 72 days is the maximum encystment period or to claim that this is a frequent occurrence. I would bet that in most cases 42 days would be more than sufficient. Yet, there are also indicators that there are strains that may hold out longer. So in the end there is no way to say how long is enough, only that the longer you go the better your odds get. After 90 days your chances of being ich free are pretty good, though 30 may already be enough.
__________________
Pairs: 4 percula, 3 P. kauderni, 3 D. excisus, 1 ea of P. diacanthus, S. splendidus, C. altivelis O. rosenblatti, D. janssi, S. yasha & a Gramma loreto trio 3 P. diacanthus. 2 C. starcki Current Tank Info: 200 gal 4 tank system (40x28x24 + 40B + 40B sump tank + 20g refugium) + 30x18x18 mixed reef + 20g East Pacific biotop + 20g FW +... |
09/30/2016, 10:55 AM | #15 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 125
|
Quote:
Edit: http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2388421 This one? Because "Unfortunately, there is no published value for the standard deviation of the life cycle of Cryptocaryon irritans." Also being that this uses the life cycle mean, I'm suspect if that is even the figure we want to be examining. More directly when going fallow, we really only care about how long the cysts can remain viable. Last edited by 00101; 09/30/2016 at 11:02 AM. |
|
09/30/2016, 11:39 AM | #16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 9,555
|
Well, if you remove your fish from an ich infested tank and return them 72 days later and happen to have a cyst (tomont) that lasted 72 days, your fallow period would have failed.
What is mostly ignored are the protomont (up to 18h) stage and tomite (up to 48h) stages These add roughly 3 days to the possible 72 day tomont duration for the required fallow period. So if you assume that 72 days is the longest a cyst can hold out you would need to wait 75 days before returning the fish.
__________________
Pairs: 4 percula, 3 P. kauderni, 3 D. excisus, 1 ea of P. diacanthus, S. splendidus, C. altivelis O. rosenblatti, D. janssi, S. yasha & a Gramma loreto trio 3 P. diacanthus. 2 C. starcki Current Tank Info: 200 gal 4 tank system (40x28x24 + 40B + 40B sump tank + 20g refugium) + 30x18x18 mixed reef + 20g East Pacific biotop + 20g FW +... |
09/30/2016, 02:49 PM | #17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 11
|
This has just about everything you'd ever want to know about Cryptocaryon. It references the 1997 Colorni and Burgess study that showed the infamous 72-day tomont, but it also discusses the average lengths of time before tomont-to-theront progression based on both Colorni and Burgess 1997, and on Diggles and Lester 1996.
|
10/09/2016, 08:39 PM | #18 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 125
|
Quote:
The 1996 study by Diggles and Lester does not offer any data of tomont excystment past 15 days, other than around half had done so by that point. This study also hypothesizes that excystment times varied so significantly between the two isolates because of the local conditions of where the isolate is from, with the isolate obtained from tropical reef water taking longer to excyst at their 20C and 25C conditions than the the isolate from cooler waters. So there's a significant variable that we don't have anyway of actually nailing down. I would hazard that most ciliates in our tanks come from tropical waters, but with how many different fish are coming from all over the world and being handled who knows where, its hard to say for certain. Now where does this leave us? I don't know. Without the 1992 thesis, there's really no way to accurately interpret the data and apply it to our reef tanks. Especially since I hear many who talk about this figure saying that the 72 days was accomplished with lower temperatures and/or salinity. Which the Diggles and Lester study showed significantly impacts excystment times. |
|
10/09/2016, 10:03 PM | #19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 492
|
I stand corrected. 72 days did not work for me. New fish added are showing ich, and yes they were quarantined properly. It must still be in my display.
|
10/10/2016, 10:48 AM | #20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 962
|
That is the last thing I wanted to read. I am 4 weeks into my fallow period. Looks like I'm going the full 90 days.
|
10/10/2016, 11:31 AM | #21 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,867
|
I went twelve weeks and a few days. Fish were QTd and clear when they entered the tank. Within 2 weeks they had ich.
I honesty don't think there is an answer. Correction: I was thinking 12 weeks, but it was actually 3 almost 3.5 months. A loooong time. Way more than people said I needed. Still wound up with sick fish after QT |
10/10/2016, 11:33 AM | #22 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 962
|
Ok that's even worse to hear.
|
10/10/2016, 11:35 AM | #23 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 962
|
During your qt did you treat with copper?
|
10/10/2016, 01:19 PM | #24 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 492
|
I went 72 days the first time and 90 the second. Fallow periods work well for knocking down the virulence of the parasite, but in my experience it doesn't eliminate them. I am really sick to my stomach when I think about all that I've went through the past year. All of my fish went through TTM a few times. I don't touch copper.
Two of my dwarf Angels show a few spots and my tang scratches sometimes. So far it doesn't seem too bad. Only time will tell. Good luck. |
10/10/2016, 04:47 PM | #25 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 9,555
|
I killed it of in my 42 gallon tank by leaving the immune fish in the tank and only treating the very sick regal angels. No new fish I added to that tank ever showed a spot, and this tank is not only heavily stocked but has also a bit bullying going on.
I have the suspicion that at least some ich strains might have long term cysts in hibernation which wake up when they "smell" a fish near by. Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
__________________
Pairs: 4 percula, 3 P. kauderni, 3 D. excisus, 1 ea of P. diacanthus, S. splendidus, C. altivelis O. rosenblatti, D. janssi, S. yasha & a Gramma loreto trio 3 P. diacanthus. 2 C. starcki Current Tank Info: 200 gal 4 tank system (40x28x24 + 40B + 40B sump tank + 20g refugium) + 30x18x18 mixed reef + 20g East Pacific biotop + 20g FW +... |
|
|