Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01/21/2019, 04:30 PM   #1
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Light Test Results - Kessil, AI Hydra 52, Ecotech & more

I started another thread where I said I'd put this up once we found time to do the testing cause the shop is ridiculously busy all the time. This was with an Apogee 520, which is one of the best meters we've ever seen. Did as much testing up and down, left and right, just everywhere in order to try to get the best results.

All lights were hung 9 inches off the water surface. We used a medium amount of surface agitation (pictured) since most reefers do. The results were kind of shocking for the first two lights we did today. These are the results between the Hydra 52 and the AP700. We'll let other be the judge of this.

Forgive the tank appearance as it was primarily set up for this purpose lol

Aqua Illumination Hydra 52

Light 9 inches off water surface. Light meter 6 inches submerged directly under the LEDs 515.

4 inches to the left or right of the edge of the light 6 inches submerged 200-215.

9 inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 285-295

9-13 inches meter submerged the numbers*remained consistent

16 inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 255-285

20 inches deep directly under the LEDs 145-155


Kessil AP700

Light 9 inches off water surface and submerged inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 285-305

4 inches to the left or right of the edge of the light and 6 inches below the water surface 175-185

8 inches below the water water surface the numbers remained fairly consistent.

10 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs - 200-215

17 inches below the water surface directly under LEDs 205-225

20 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs 175-185


Attached Images
File Type: jpg 281.jpg (14.7 KB, 129 views)
File Type: jpg 285.jpg (26.5 KB, 118 views)
File Type: jpg 269.jpg (57.0 KB, 117 views)
File Type: jpg 273.jpg (29.8 KB, 112 views)
File Type: jpg 271.jpg (51.7 KB, 111 views)
Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/21/2019, 11:22 PM   #2
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
One thing I should mention is the AP700 was set manually to the highest light intensity that can be achieved through the manual setting on the unit itself. Mainly because of this. Uh, no. This shop has had the same WiFi password for years that everyone uses. I'm not resetting it and removing F,K, or P so I can connect to the Kessil App. We are not sure if a higher intensity can be achieved using the app itself.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20190121_145754.jpg (25.1 KB, 97 views)
Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/31/2019, 05:44 PM   #3
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
And done with Ecotech XR30 Gen 4 Pro testing.

The first thing I'd like to mention is these lights were an inch HIGHER above the water surface then the AI or Kessil AP700.

This light was absolutely amazing. PAR strength was so impressive that we're going to be switching most of the coral tanks in the shop over to them. We didn't expect to see such a huge difference between the top of the line Ecotech and Kessil lights, but there was. For what's supposed to be 15 watts more on the Ecotech there was a massive increase in light levels. The cost isn't much more, but the PAR numbers averaged 20-40% higher. Amazing LEDs.

The one thing we don't really understand is why the numbers are so much lower on the Kessil AP700 - we tested 2 LEDs. One of the employees here was wondering if it's actually due to the "Dense Matrix". The employee here was thinking maybe since the beam is so direct or "concentrated", and not as spread out, that the medium amount of water surface agitation is causing it to break the light strength up more. We don't actually know though.

Again, this was a lighting text tank, so excuse the algae lol

Ecotech XR30 Gen 4 Pro

Light 10 inches off water surface and submerged 6 inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 500-515

4 inches to the left or right of the edge of the light and 6 inches below the water surface 285-305

10-13 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs - 340-350

17 inches below the water surface directly under LEDs 350-370

20 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs 270-280


Attached Images
File Type: jpg 307.jpg (23.5 KB, 91 views)
File Type: jpg 305.jpg (20.6 KB, 92 views)
File Type: jpg 303.jpg (47.8 KB, 91 views)
Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/31/2019, 05:57 PM   #4
Vinny Kreyling
Registered Member
 
Vinny Kreyling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Miller Place, NY
Posts: 7,206
I thought to test PAR the pumps should be OFF.


__________________
250 gallon mixed reef, 2 Reefbreeder's Photon V 2, Deepwater BLDC 12, DAS EX-3 Skimmer, MTC mini cal, 2-3/4" Sea Swirls, Aquacontroller & 6 Tunze pumps.
Vinny Kreyling is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/31/2019, 08:46 PM   #5
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Are your pumps OFF all the time? We wanted what our corals are actually getting when our tanks are operating under their regular conditions.


Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/31/2019, 09:00 PM   #6
biecacka
Registered Member
 
biecacka's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 6,361
Interesting results. I am surprised at the AP700 numbers myself.


Corey


biecacka is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/01/2019, 08:09 AM   #7
Green Chromis
Registered Member
 
Green Chromis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: miami,florida
Posts: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reef2Land View Post
I started another thread where I said I'd put this up once we found time to do the testing cause the shop is ridiculously busy all the time. This was with an Apogee 520, which is one of the best meters we've ever seen. Did as much testing up and down, left and right, just everywhere in order to try to get the best results.

All lights were hung 9 inches off the water surface. We used a medium amount of surface agitation (pictured) since most reefers do. The results were kind of shocking for the first two lights we did today. These are the results between the Hydra 52 and the AP700. We'll let other be the judge of this.

Forgive the tank appearance as it was primarily set up for this purpose lol

Aqua Illumination Hydra 52

Light 9 inches off water surface. Light meter 6 inches submerged directly under the LEDs 515.

4 inches to the left or right of the edge of the light 6 inches submerged 200-215.

9 inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 285-295

9-13 inches meter submerged the numbers*remained consistent

16 inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 255-285

20 inches deep directly under the LEDs 145-155


Kessil AP700

Light 9 inches off water surface and submerged inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 285-305

4 inches to the left or right of the edge of the light and 6 inches below the water surface 175-185

8 inches below the water water surface the numbers remained fairly consistent.

10 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs - 200-215

17 inches below the water surface directly under LEDs 205-225

20 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs 175-185


Thanks for the reviews, will you be able to test the Mitra LX 7206 lights or the new Orphek Atlantic V4 lights?


__________________
Natural Reefer

Current Tank Info: 600 gallon Carribean Reef System, ETSS Protein Skimmer, 1.5HP Tradewinds Chiller, Reef Breeders Photon V2+ LED Lighting For The Refugium, Mitra LX7206 LED Lights For Display Tank
Green Chromis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/01/2019, 12:09 PM   #8
zip70
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 84
Thanks for sharing. good to know


zip70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/02/2019, 07:00 PM   #9
Kevin Guthrie
Registered Member
 
Kevin Guthrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 506
Thanks for the data, but do you know how long each of the fixtures has been running? All else being equal I would expect a brand new light to be the brightest because the output drops off over time.


Kevin Guthrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/02/2019, 10:46 PM   #10
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Chromis View Post
Thanks for the reviews, will you be able to test the Mitra LX 7206 lights or the new Orphek Atlantic V4 lights?
Yes. We're going to be testing at least the Orphek as well.


Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/02/2019, 10:47 PM   #11
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Guthrie View Post
Thanks for the data, but do you know how long each of the fixtures has been running? All else being equal I would expect a brand new light to be the brightest because the output drops off over time.
We only did all brand new lights right out of the box.


Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/08/2019, 10:23 PM   #12
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Maxspect Curve & Recurve (testing was done with the lights set to deepest penetration)

Light 9 inches off water surface and submerged inches below water surface directly under the LEDs 185-215

4 inches to the left or right of the edge of the light and 6 inches below the water surface 135-145

8 inches below the water surface the numbers remained consistent.

10 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs 165-175

17 inches below the water surface directly under LEDs 125-145

20 inches below the water surface directly under the LEDs 115-135

We don’t offer another LED brand

We purchased one of these and were not too impressed at all. The larger form factor lights seem to be going extinct, which is why we couldn’t understand why Maxspect wouldn’t stick with smaller lights (such as the Ethereal) over these larger bodies. The Ethereal was a solid seller. None of the employees here like larger lights anymore. When so much can be accomplished with something such as the Radions of Kessils, why even engineer lights of this nature? We can’t figure out what benefit it might have.

We couldn’t get the PAR levels to top 225 when the light is supposed to be pushing over 300 watts. We’re wondering if it may have been a defective light, but we don’t want to pay to find that out.

Another thing we didn’t care for when it came to these lights was, in general, what most hobbyists have come to know as “standards regarding warranty issues”. Most of the smaller body lights want us reefers to hang our lights almost a foot off the water surface to ensure condensation doesn’t ruin the valuable components. With both the Curve and Recurve there seemed to be a decent amount of condensation that would form of especially the LED shields when the stock tank mount brackets were used.

With the smaller form LED lights atleast the power supplies were enclosed for the most part. These have what looks like a CPU housing with a “screen” over it. After only 90-days the power supply was almost completely suffocated by dust and lint (but this is Colorado). We don’t want to pull it apart to view the inside because it will likely void the warranty, but adding dust and moisture can’t be good for a unit like this.


Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2019, 10:34 AM   #13
JustinWI
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 10
Do you know approximately how much less the XR15 G4 pro puts out compared to that XR30? I'd love to see the results from XR15 if possible.
BTW Great work on this testing.


JustinWI is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2019, 01:35 PM   #14
lancesmith1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chattanooga, tn
Posts: 54
Recurve PAR

Wow! The par numbers for the Recurve are poor at best. If I had bought one of these I would feel like I had been shafted.


lancesmith1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2019, 07:56 PM   #15
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by lancesmith1 View Post
Wow! The par numbers for the Recurve are poor at best. If I had bought one of these I would feel like I had been shafted.
We all were kind of stunned by how low there were too. Then I watched some YouTube videos where a couple people saw the same numbers. It might have been a defective light, which is why I mentioned that. Cause those numbers were super low. But I also thought the AP700 would be higher also.


Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/11/2019, 06:25 AM   #16
lancesmith1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chattanooga, tn
Posts: 54
BTW - Thanks for doing this. I like the way you are explaining the PAR readings. It is simple and easy to understand. Keep them coming if you can!


lancesmith1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/13/2019, 10:35 PM   #17
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
I'm trying to get ahold of a C-Ray to test. Hopefully those will be coming soon. ATI Powermodule should be done in a week. We actually do days of testing and check the PAR throughout the day with all these tests.


Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/15/2019, 11:31 PM   #18
rodneyri
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 822
AWESOME thanks for sharing!!

here are some readings of the Radion G4 Pro with diffusers...and yes there was water and wavemakers on for the readings




__________________
Too poor starphire
- 7ft Reef - Profilux 3 - GHL Doser 2 - Bubble King - RD3 Speedy - Vortech QD40 - Radion G4 Pro -P̵a̵c̵ ̵S̵u̵n̵ ̵
rodneyri is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2019, 04:21 AM   #19
Big E
Registered Member
 
Big E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Euclid, OH
Posts: 4,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reef2Land View Post
Yes. We're going to be testing at least the Orphek as well.
One thing lost in your testing is coverage..........a lot depends on how many of the units are used over the space you're trying to cover. You don't want hot spots and or low par gaps.

For another data point for comparison I took this snapshot from the BRS video on the OrphekV4.

This is two Orpheks units at 12" over a 48x24" area vs an 8x54w Sunpower......can't match the Sunpower.

If you did this same test with two Radions I'd be willing to bet it won't even match the Orpheks.




__________________
80g Rimless Acropora System

reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2197142&page=31

Ed
Big E is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2019, 10:22 AM   #20
acesq
Registered Member
 
acesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 1,501
I went back and looked at BRS Investigates videos for the Orphek, Sunpower and Radion XR30 G4. They are all within a percentage or two of each other if you keep in mind the height at which the fixtures are hung in the BRS videos. The Orpheks are hung at 12", the Sunpower at 8.5" and the Radions at 9". That puts the Orpheks at a good sized disadvantage yet the numbers were still very close.

The Radions put out slightly less par than the other two, but they are only 190W each while the Orphek is 235 and the Sunpower is 432. Given the power difference, the Radions seem to be slightly more efficient than the other two in generating par.

I've had all three units at one time or another (Orphek Atlantik V1) and they are all great lights. I've settled on the Radion XR30 G4s with T5 supplements and love the color I'm pulling and the quality of the light.


__________________
Current tank: 340g AGE peninsula
acesq is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2019, 10:24 AM   #21
cflow
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 792
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodneyri View Post
AWESOME thanks for sharing!!

here are some readings of the Radion G4 Pro with diffusers...and yes there was water and wavemakers on for the readings

Thank you for these results. How far off the tank are your lights mounted? That's 75% intensity correct?


cflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2019, 02:22 PM   #22
rodneyri
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by cflow View Post
Thank you for these results. How far off the tank are your lights mounted? That's 75% intensity correct?
One thing i missed lol they are 12" above water and yep 75% intensity


__________________
Too poor starphire
- 7ft Reef - Profilux 3 - GHL Doser 2 - Bubble King - RD3 Speedy - Vortech QD40 - Radion G4 Pro -P̵a̵c̵ ̵S̵u̵n̵ ̵
rodneyri is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2019, 05:34 PM   #23
cflow
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 792
Good info. I noticed some of my corals lost a lot of color after doing a carbon change. I thought my g4 with diffuser was dialed down enough, but evidently not. Slowly making a comeback.


cflow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/17/2019, 03:00 AM   #24
Big E
Registered Member
 
Big E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Euclid, OH
Posts: 4,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by acesq View Post
I went back and looked at BRS Investigates videos for the Orphek, Sunpower and Radion XR30 G4. They are all within a percentage or two of each other if you keep in mind the height at which the fixtures are hung in the BRS videos. The Orpheks are hung at 12", the Sunpower at 8.5" and the Radions at 9". That puts the Orpheks at a good sized disadvantage yet the numbers were still very close.

The Radions put out slightly less par than the other two, but they are only 190W each while the Orphek is 235 and the Sunpower is 432. Given the power difference, the Radions seem to be slightly more efficient than the other two in generating par.

I've had all three units at one time or another (Orphek Atlantik V1) and they are all great lights. I've settled on the Radion XR30 G4s with T5 supplements and love the color I'm pulling and the quality of the light.
I'm not trying to steer the thread towards a Sunpower only to point out if you want the same performance/coverage you need two Orpheks- 740W and 3 Radions- 570w. I am talking about for dominant Acropora systems. You can get away with less for common mixed reefs.

Radions combined with T5 is fine if you want to go that route.

I'd have to go back and look at the video but I thought they were at the same height. My point was more about the coverage and consistency of the par distribution. I'll also point out you only need a range of 200-500 For a 24" deep tank. Most Led units can produce that now, but there is the bigger issue of coverage and spectrum distribution if you don't have enough units.

Everyone talks about Sanjay' tank.....he had a ton of units over his tank. More than double of what most people try to use.


__________________
80g Rimless Acropora System

reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2197142&page=31

Ed
Big E is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/24/2019, 03:12 PM   #25
Reef2Land
Registered Member
 
Reef2Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by acesq View Post
I went back and looked at BRS Investigates videos for the Orphek, Sunpower and Radion XR30 G4. They are all within a percentage or two of each other if you keep in mind the height at which the fixtures are hung in the BRS videos. The Orpheks are hung at 12", the Sunpower at 8.5" and the Radions at 9". That puts the Orpheks at a good sized disadvantage yet the numbers were still very close.

The Radions put out slightly less par than the other two, but they are only 190W each while the Orphek is 235 and the Sunpower is 432. Given the power difference, the Radions seem to be slightly more efficient than the other two in generating par.

I've had all three units at one time or another (Orphek Atlantik V1) and they are all great lights. I've settled on the Radion XR30 G4s with T5 supplements and love the color I'm pulling and the quality of the light.
The Orpheks are going to have a broader range simply because the LEDs cover nearly the entire body. Does that make sense? Orphek has always seemed to care that their LEDs are powerful and there's more of them. That doesn't mean the color blending is more beneficial for corals though. We actually decided not to test Orphek at all.


Reef2Land is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.