Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

View Poll Results: Saltwater vs freshwater
saltwater 69 98.57%
freshwater 1 1.43%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01/09/2015, 02:43 PM   #1
Radiation91
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 35
Question Saltwater vs freshwater

This could start a huge debate but I'm willing to try!

I've always been fascinated by corals and I decided to join the fishkeeping hobby with a Freshwater tank because it's cheaper and supposedly easier. Now that I've got experience... I'm looking towards a coral tank.

So, I'm calling on you fellow Reefers to share your experiences!

Which is best... Saltwater or Freshwater?
Pros and cons of each?

I look forward to seeing what you all think!

Rad91


Radiation91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 02:47 PM   #2
toothybugs
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The smallest county in Illinois
Posts: 1,986
I used to think freshwater was just awesome, til I was working at my petshop and a guy said "just try setting a small salt tank up, bet you money you don't go back."

That was over 8 years ago.

That first 20 crashed (my tank babysitter flaked out on me), so I stripped it and set it up for fresh again.

A month later it had salt water back in it.



And now I'm a chemist. Fresh just doesn't have anything for me anymore.



Fresh was fun because (I thought) it was simple and straight to the core of the fishkeeping hobby. But at the same time, I thrive on problem solving. Now I need the chemistry issues and challenges of a reef to keep me involved.



Last edited by toothybugs; 01/09/2015 at 03:09 PM.
toothybugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 02:53 PM   #3
tripdad
Frustrated Stick Gardener
 
tripdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: near chicago,Ill.
Posts: 701
I don't know if your going to get a fair polling on a website devoted to reefing? Maybe try an aquarium site. I can't speak for everyone but I relate better to "marine" environments.


tripdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 02:58 PM   #4
soulpatch
Registered Member
 
soulpatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 4,017
Give me a year to truly answer this. HA HA. I am just getting into salt coming from fresh. I still have a large planted DT in my living room that I love though.

I think both have a certain beauty though. Corals and the colorful fish in salt are mind boggling but yet a great planted tank with shoals of fish are equally mesmorizing. Heck I used to think Neons were a joke till I had 50+ of them shoaling through my plants. I had a smaller biotube with archer fish who would shoot water to get their food I stuck to the back walls.

I wouldnt say either is easier then the other. You need to dose and monitor lighting for a planted freshwater much like you need to do for a coral tank. both need QT and fish acclimated. Temperature is imperative as is water chemistry. The biggest difference I can think about though is the stability of the tank and the fact I can use faucet water for my freshwater fish.

For stability I can throw a battery air pump into my freshwater tanks to keep things alive when power goes out. The temp can drop considerably and everything will survive. Same can not be as easily said for a salt tank. If that tank drops to 55 degrees you are losing things.

Though this is a reason I have a massive generator now too. The wife does complain that I turn off the space heater so I can power up everything for the fish tanks....


soulpatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 03:02 PM   #5
EDJFA
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 1,025
I was going to say that you do know you're on ReefCentral, right? How many freshwater reefs are there out there.

I have seen some very cool freshwater tanks, but the coolest tanks out there are hands down saltwater.

With that said, I think for the average person who just simply likes to look at fish, a freshwater tank is hard to beat. It's simple, no real need for anything fancy like skimmers, controllers, sumps, RODI systems, or super expensive lighting. The fish are cheaper and easy to get. We had a 30-40g freshwater tank growing up and I thought it was the awesome.

There are so many variations on each version, though. Planted tanks are as intricate as our reef tanks. Biotope tanks, brackish tanks, FOWLRs,...I could go on. I have a friend who wants to try keeping trout in a really long aquarium. He's going to have to figure out how to keep the current flowing at an insane rate to mimic a river.

I'd agree that one isn't necessarily better than the other.

I do believe that people don't give this hobby enough thought before jumping in. How many times have we heard the stories about the people walking out of Petco with a 20g tank, a bucket of salt, some Prime, and a Yellow Tang? Way too many. I'm sure there are tons of stories on the freshwater sites where the noobs completely screwed up their tank from the get go. I wish more people would at least read a web page before they go out and buy Nemo for their 5 yr old.


__________________
Current Tank: 210g mixed reef. 75g sump AquaMaxx ConeS skimmer, Jebao DCS9000 return pump, ATO, Reefbreeders Photon 48 on a custom lighting schedule

Last edited by EDJFA; 01/09/2015 at 03:11 PM.
EDJFA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 03:03 PM   #6
mmn
Registered Member
 
mmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 340
I like apples, but I like oranges better.


__________________
Regards
Michael

125g DT, Jebao DC9000, BA drain, 55g sump, Mixing: 2x32g Brutes, Panworld 30PX, 20l QT, RLSS R6I skimmer, 3 x Kessil A360WE, Neptune Apex.

Current Tank Info: 2 clowns, 2 blue-green chromis, 2 Duncans and 2 GSPs
mmn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 03:09 PM   #7
IgnatiusRath
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 50
Love both, but honestly I don't think I'll ever keep much for fresh again. I do have a small planted tank, but it's low maintenance and largely still up because I like the water sound in my bedroom. Nothing like what I used to keep for fresh. Just too much difference in the life that goes on in a reef compared to a fresh tank.


IgnatiusRath is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 03:10 PM   #8
soulpatch
Registered Member
 
soulpatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDJFA View Post
It's simple, no real need for anything fancy like skimmers, controllers, sumps, RODI systems, or super expensive lighting. The fish are cheaper and easy to get.
I would argue that. If you went with a fish only salt tank and compare that to a fish only fresh tank both need minimal equipment.

To compare a reef tank you would need to look at a planted tank and those have very similar equipment needs...


soulpatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 03:11 PM   #9
IgnatiusRath
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmn View Post
I like apples, but I like oranges better.
+1


IgnatiusRath is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 03:11 PM   #10
soulpatch
Registered Member
 
soulpatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by IgnatiusRath View Post
Just too much difference in the life that goes on in a reef compared to a fresh tank.
That right there is why I am starting a reef tank. Seeing the corals interacting with the rest adds another layer that I dont currently have with my planted tanks.


soulpatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 04:10 PM   #11
d2mini
Registered Member
 
d2mini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 10,344
I love to look at freshwater planted tanks, there as some insanely creative and beautiful ones out there.
But for me, nothing beats a saltwater reef tank just because it never gets boring! There is always new things to see/discover, new challenges, new coral to buy (or grow and sell/share), etc. The actual keeping of a freshwater tank is so boring in comparison. To me.


__________________
-dennis

Elos Diamond 120xl | Elos Stand | Radion G4 Pros | GHL Profilux Controller | LifeReef Skimmer | LifeReef Sump
Photos taken with a Nikon D750 or Leica M.
d2mini is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 06:11 PM   #12
mandarin_goby
Registered Member
 
mandarin_goby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 844
I love both, so I can't choose one over the other. I've had freshwater for 20+ years and salt for almost 3....they each have their challenges. I've never used CO2 in a FW tank before, but I just bought a 75 gallon set up with CO2 - I'm really excited I also have an 8 gallon rimless shrimp set up - I just graduated from basic cherry shrimp to the fancier crystal shrimp - I never get bored!

The reef is fascinating to me...I love the colors and movement while the FW planted is more serene - something to suit every mood. Nothing more peaceful than watching a school of neons swimming through a densely planted tank. FW is like a little water garden for me - I get lost in pruning leaves and rearranging plants.

FW *can* be cheaper than salt, unless you get Eheim filters (my favorite) and a really nice light fixture, but good ol' Aquaclear filters work great...I tried cheap with salt and regretted it (Koralia nano pumps and Odyssea lights - what a waste of $$).

FW planted will always have my heart, but reefing has totally sucked me in also, for different reasons.

Reefing is more challenging for sure - certain corals can't touch others and others grow out of control (xenia), so it has a whole new set of challenges I'm embracing but I love seeing everything thrive. I love the interaction between critters like my pistol shrimp and hi-fin goby, sexy shrimp and their maxi-mini and the clown with her bubbletip nem - just fascinating to watch.


__________________
75 with Eshopps 100 sump, Reef Octopus 110 SSS skimmer, Sicce 3.0 pump, Maxspect Gyre 130, 2 x Kessil a360W, mangroves plus clip-on bulb in sump

75 FW planted with CO2, 12 gallon cherry shrimp tank

Last edited by mandarin_goby; 01/09/2015 at 06:17 PM.
mandarin_goby is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/09/2015, 06:17 PM   #13
Timfish
Registered Member
 
Timfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
Reef tanks will accrue more value faster just with basic maintnenace.


__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek
Timfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 03:02 PM   #14
Radiation91
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripdad View Post
I don't know if your going to get a fair polling on a website devoted to reefing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDJFA View Post
I was going to say that you do know you're on ReefCentral, right? How many freshwater reefs are there out there.
There's always a bigger plan in place Look past the obvious

On ReefCentral: 22 to SW and 0 to FW, so far.
On other freshwater forums: 5 to SW and 25 to FW, that's 20% to SW.

"once you go reef, you never go leaf" haha I couldn't resist writing that! And it's not an accurate statement either, based on your comments It's more accurate to say that reefers tend not to vote FW whereas FW's will sometimes vote for SW. Interesting!

Well, I've enjoyed reading this thread! and the FW forums too for that matter... It's shown some common themes which I'll collate here.

Reasons for FW
  • SW tanks all look the same
  • FW tanks are much cheaper
  • Without an automated system, SW tanks are always on your mind
  • There is much more flexibility with the aquascaping of FW. (similar to point 1 with slight differences apparently)
  • You can buy cheap and still get great results
  • Very low maintenance - getting a sitter for your tank is much easier.
  • FW looks fresher than SW - interpret that however you wish!

A few people prefer FW purely because they've had a bad experience with SW and given up on it.

Reasons for SW
  • FW tanks all look the same - green/red leaves, usually following the rules of aquascaping (contrasting against bullet 1 in the FW list)
  • SW tanks are dynamic - moving corals like pulsing xenia and anemones etc
  • SW corals/fauna have luminous and vibrant colors (due to lighting?)
  • Lots of enjoyment setting up a reef system and equipment
  • Relationships between fauna and surroundings, fauna and each other, corals with other corals
  • Greater variation with types of creatures
  • Better viewing in the evening/nighttime. FW moonlights can't be too strong whereas SW can have fairly strong nightlights running.
  • The challenge!

Well... that was fun!

Obviously this list isn't exhaustive and is based on common opinions. It's been quite an insight and hopefully newcomers will find it useful!


Radiation91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 03:05 PM   #15
Dmorty217
Saltwater Addict
 
Dmorty217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vandalia OHIO
Posts: 11,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radiation91 View Post
This could start a huge debate but I'm willing to try!

I've always been fascinated by corals and I decided to join the fishkeeping hobby with a Freshwater tank because it's cheaper and supposedly easier. Now that I've got experience... I'm looking towards a coral tank.

So, I'm calling on you fellow Reefers to share your experiences!

Which is best... Saltwater or Freshwater?
Pros and cons of each?

I look forward to seeing what you all think!

Rad91
This isn't how you get your posts up by asking rhetorical on a forum you just joined. This is called Reef Central so what do you think the response is going to be? Notice how there isn't anyone on here asking freshwater questions?


__________________
Fish are not disposable commodities, but a worthwhile investment that can be maintained and enjoyed for many years, providing one is willing to take the time to understand their requirements and needs

Current Tank Info: 625g, 220g sump, RD3 230w, Vectra L1 on a closed loop, 3 MP60s, MP40. Several QTs
Dmorty217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 03:10 PM   #16
phenom5
Unregistered Member
 
phenom5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2mini View Post
I love to look at freshwater planted tanks, there as some insanely creative and beautiful ones out there.
But for me, nothing beats a saltwater reef tank just because it never gets boring! There is always new things to see/discover, new challenges, new coral to buy (or grow and sell/share), etc. The actual keeping of a freshwater tank is so boring in comparison. To me.
+1

Dennis pretty much hit the nail on the head. Hell, at this point reef tanks don't really keep my interest unless it's SPS.


__________________
Rob

Current Tank Info: DSA 155 Pro | ATI Sunpower | ATB 840 v2 | Apex | Wav
phenom5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 03:15 PM   #17
W1ngz
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 295
You're going to get biased results on a reef forum... but...
I started fish a year ago and ended up with 2 freshwater tanks, one planted. In July I scored a free 75 gallon tank and stand. I could have saved a ton of cash had I turned it into a monster planted tank. It would be a lot less time consuming and easier to arrange vacations, since a planted tank could get by perfectly well with an automatic feeder for a week, or even 2.

I find myself often ignoring the planted tank now. It's beautiful, but... so is the 4' reef tank on the opposite wall. And much more varied in specimens and activity.


__________________
75 Gal., bean animal drain, 80lbs of rock, 1" of crushed coral and aragonite mix and a pair of 850 Koralias. 25 gal. sump, Syncra 3 return, Eshopps PSK-150 skimmer and 2 150W heaters.
W1ngz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 03:28 PM   #18
adamv
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 56
I started in fresh, but the colors and diversity in salt, plus the higher level of difficult and care is more rewarding/satisfying.


adamv is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 03:59 PM   #19
Radiation91
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmorty217 View Post
This isn't how you get your posts up by asking rhetorical on a forum you just joined. This is called Reef Central so what do you think the response is going to be? Notice how there isn't anyone on here asking freshwater questions?
wow. thanks. getting a negative vibe

1) I knew the thread would be biased but I wanted to compare how biased it was compared with FW forums. As I've mentioned, it seems that reefers stick to SW in the poll. But for FW forums, there's more diversity with the results. The comparison is what I was looking at. THAT is why I set up the poll. THAT's the big picture which I'm looking at and THAT's what I've written up for others to see.

2) I have no interest in getting my posts up... I'm interested in learning. Set my post count permanently to 0 if you have to.. I post to learn from others. Honestly, I've seen absolutely no reef tanks in person in a domestic setting, which is pretty unfortunate. They seem to be much more common in the USA from what I've seen (and yes I know this is a .com site but I'm speaking generally).

Back to the point... The only reef tanks I've seen are at my LFS and at tourist aquariums. Right now, this site/forum is my only real place of getting opinions and experiences from others. I'm only asking questions that would make for a good conversation with somebody. Frankly, the points been made from this poll have highlighted a whole range of things for me (and possibly others) to go away with and think about.

I've had a lot more questions that I haven't asked because they've already been mentioned elsewhere and I've found answers on those threads.

Thanks


Radiation91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 04:17 PM   #20
alton
Registered Member
 
alton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zuehl, Texas
Posts: 4,460
Freshwater = Boring
I think I had my first freshwater tank when I was 8? Raised my first batch of Jack Dempseys at 12.
Switched to Saltwater at 31. You can only have so much fun feeding Oscars Crawfish. Planted tanks look nice but are too easy, and therefore boring. I still take care of my wife's 5 gallon planted Betta tank.


alton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 04:25 PM   #21
GilliganReef
Registered Member
 
GilliganReef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmorty217 View Post
This isn't how you get your posts up by asking rhetorical on a forum you just joined. This is called Reef Central so what do you think the response is going to be? Notice how there isn't anyone on here asking freshwater questions?
Really? You had to reply with something like this? I thought the same thing, because this is a SW forum, but a lot of people here got started from FW. He’s just asking for advice which reefcentralers on this forum love to give. People who respond back like you. Make people like me hesitate on asking questions at all. Be polite.


GilliganReef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 04:31 PM   #22
Mrramsey
NEO Reefer
 
Mrramsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 1,801
I guess you have to look at it like this...

Freshwater vs FOWLR vs Reef

I started freshwater then planted but I was never impressed in the fish and color choices.

There is a significant cost difference between Fresh and FOWLR but maintenance wise really no more or less. Reefing is different than both.


__________________
Mike
My 120 Build:
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2389417

Current Tank Info: 120g In-Wall | BA Overflow | 55g Sump | SWC Extreme 150 Skimmer | DIY ATO | 2 Jebao RW-8| Fluval SP6 | Photon 48v2 LED | GFO and Carbon
Mrramsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 04:46 PM   #23
jrp1588
Registered Member
 
jrp1588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,864
I ran FW tanks ever since I was 6 or 7 years old. In my teens, I dabbled with high light FW planted tanks with CO2 injection and angelfish breeding. Definitely a lot more instant gratification, plants grow WAY faster than coral, and I still miss breeding. I never quite figured out pruning though. After pruning, my plants would look like a hacked up mess. Availability of fish and supplies locally is very different for FW and SW. We only have 1 place in town that has a half decent fish selection in SW, and I have to drive almost an hour for coral.

I find SW fish to be much more interesting. Their behavior is a lot more unique from fish to fish. Most of them seem smarter. The only FW fish I ever owned that seemed to have half a brain were bettas and angel fish. I also find coral to be more interesting than plants, it seems more alive, and it grows in much more organically. I don't have to prune it into place.


jrp1588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 04:53 PM   #24
HiFidelity
Registered Member
 
HiFidelity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 132
had a 10g FW planted tank, then a 5g planted Beta tank. Today it's salt or bust unless FW corals fall out of the sky


HiFidelity is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/16/2015, 04:56 PM   #25
Radiation91
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by GilliganReef View Post
Really? You had to reply with something like this? I thought the same thing, because this is a SW forum, but a lot of people here got started from FW. He’s just asking for advice which reefcentralers on this forum love to give. People who respond back like you. Make people like me hesitate on asking questions at all. Be polite.
Thanks for the vote of confidence there Gilligan. I thought I might have misread what Dmorty was saying until you commented. Feeling better now

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrramsey View Post
I guess you have to look at it like this...

Freshwater vs FOWLR vs Reef

I started freshwater then planted but I was never impressed in the fish and color choices.

There is a significant cost difference between Fresh and FOWLR but maintenance wise really no more or less. Reefing is different than both.
I'm not sure how, but I've never realised FOWLR was "Fish Only With Live Rock" until now. I thought it was a brand of tank like Red Sea

Also, like you, I am looking at the FW tanks and wishing they had more impressive colours. Don't get me wrong, my FW tanks look great but I'd like some colours other than green



Last edited by Radiation91; 01/16/2015 at 04:57 PM. Reason: didn't realise the "fun" emoticon involved shooting
Radiation91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
freshwater, pros and cons, saltwater


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.