|
08/21/2017, 01:57 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 273
|
Long-Term Effects of Fluconazole Use?
I've been struggling with GHA for several months and I've tried just about everything - GFO, wet skimming, Carbon dosing, weekly water changes, etc...
I've always had Nitrates around 10 and Phosphates reading 0 (I assume because the GHA is using it all up). Macro algae that I've introduced to my fuge has always either stagnated or died off, likely because the GHA is using up all of the nutrients. I dosed fluconazole a week ago and as of today 90% of my GHA is gone. I re-introduced macro algae thinking that it will start to use up some of the nutrients that the dead GHA no longer needs. My plan was to wait another week (2 weeks total), do a water change, and dose another round of fluconazole. Then I started thinking that maybe a lower, long-term, maintenance dose of fluconazole might be better. At least until I'm able to get some serious nutrient transport via macro algae. Maybe 2-3 months of weekly water changes and fluconazole? Thoughts? Any issue with long term dosing of fluconazole? I'd essentially need to stop skimming but doing weekly water changes I don't get much production out of the skimmer anyway so I'm not sure that's really a issue. |
08/21/2017, 03:39 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
|
Its a fairly new treatment I believe.. I doubt there is any long term data..
I personally do not think its a long term solution.. Have you been checking your nitrate/phosphate levels now that the GHA is gone? How long has the tank been setup for ? How bad was the GHA? any pics?
__________________
Who me? |
08/26/2017, 07:45 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,515
|
My concern with long term use is that you will build resistant strains of algae and then fluconazole will be useless. I just treated with fluconazole 2 weeks ago and been running my skimmer and also have about 90% reduction. Its that 90% number that is the issue. with 100% you'll have no survivors and a long term dose might work. If you have survivors then you have resistance.
I am thinking it would be better to rotate fluconazole with Vibrant or NOPOx while using other methods like chaeto, GFO or carbon dosing to keep it down in between. A good clean up crew doesn't hurt either.
__________________
Exodus 8:2 Check my homepage for tank pics and details. Current Tank Info: 90 gallon, 2x maxspect R420R LED, 4 Ocellaris Clowns, Yellow Eye Kole Tang, Flame Angel, Foxface Rabbitfish, Banggai Cardinals, Azure Damsel, rock flower anemone, cleaner shrimp, serpent star |
08/30/2017, 06:19 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 405
|
Where to purchase FLUCONAZOLE
everywhere I look I find I need a prescription. I have some but we just moved and I can't find it
|
08/30/2017, 08:57 AM | #5 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
|
|
08/30/2017, 12:54 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,708
|
I've had luck with a maintenance dose of API algeafix. That seemed to be the solution before the fluconazole got popular. There may be no ill effects from long term dosing, but it's hard to say with no data, and I have too much invested in my tank to be the ginea pig. the algeafix has a longer track record, but may not be as effective. For me, it's done great. I think in your situation, I'd just do the normal dosing, then instead of a maintenance dose, I'd stop dosing and only start again if the algea was coming back.
|
|
|