Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07/18/2019, 05:13 PM   #1
JustAClownFish
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: California
Posts: 226
14K Phoenix washing out tank

Hey, folks I just recently switched to a MH/T5 setup and I'm not very pleased. I have two Phoenix 14k DE running on M80 HQI ballasts and they're washing everything out except the fish. I supplement with one actinic and one blue T5 HO bulb. That's not doing anything because the two MH bulbs are so strong. The 14Ks were recommended to me by other users on this and other forums for their nice blueish look. They don't look blue at all and they do not make anything but my fish pop. My question is if this is normal for MHs or did I just get the wrong bulbs? What about supplementing with LEDs? Are LEDs strong enough to compete with the MHs?


JustAClownFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/18/2019, 08:42 PM   #2
moondoggy4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: menifee So cal
Posts: 11,042
I have had the same experience, I was looking forward to this blueish beautiful hue, it is yellow, I had my family tell me what color do they see and they said Yellow. I also have the correct ballast. The M80 and M81, so both bulbs are the same.


moondoggy4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/19/2019, 08:06 AM   #3
JustAClownFish
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: California
Posts: 226
I guess I’ll have to supplement with LED. Can you post pictures of your tank?


JustAClownFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/20/2019, 05:20 PM   #4
moondoggy4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: menifee So cal
Posts: 11,042
I took down the MH set up. try some reef brites to go with it.


moondoggy4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2019, 12:53 PM   #5
tkeracer619
Registered Member
 
tkeracer619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 17,289
I replied to your cali thread but I may have some ballasts for you. Also, saw you posted a while ago about your red sea refractometer... not sure if you resolved it but those are terrible refractometers. They don't hold calibration long enough to put down the calibration fluid and test.


__________________
Hobby Experience: 9200ish gallons, 26 skimmers, and a handful of Kent Scrapers.
Current Tank:
Vortech Powered 600G SPS Tank w/ 100gal frag tank & 100g Sump. RK2-RK10 Skimmer. ReefAngel. Radium 20k.
tkeracer619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/22/2019, 02:07 PM   #6
rocklobster1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 57
Probably something else if I had to guess.


rocklobster1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/23/2019, 03:45 PM   #7
JustAClownFish
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: California
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkeracer619 View Post
I replied to your cali thread but I may have some ballasts for you. Also, saw you posted a while ago about your red sea refractometer... not sure if you resolved it but those are terrible refractometers. They don't hold calibration long enough to put down the calibration fluid and test.
I didn't see your reply. What type of ballasts do you have?

Yes, I resolved it. The refractometer is far from terrible. It holds calibration just fine if calibrated with distilled water at room temperature. If the room temperature never changes, it will hold its calibration. I always test it with distilled water and it rarely is off. Only if the room temperature changes drastically (AC on vs AC off ) then I will have to recalibrate.


JustAClownFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/24/2019, 01:06 PM   #8
tkeracer619
Registered Member
 
tkeracer619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 17,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustAClownFish View Post
I didn't see your reply. What type of ballasts do you have?

Yes, I resolved it. The refractometer is far from terrible. It holds calibration just fine if calibrated with distilled water at room temperature. If the room temperature never changes, it will hold its calibration. I always test it with distilled water and it rarely is off. Only if the room temperature changes drastically (AC on vs AC off ) then I will have to recalibrate.
They were old coralvue eballasts. Ran phoenix very blue. I'm not sure if I still have them or not though. Having a hard time locating them.


__________________
Hobby Experience: 9200ish gallons, 26 skimmers, and a handful of Kent Scrapers.
Current Tank:
Vortech Powered 600G SPS Tank w/ 100gal frag tank & 100g Sump. RK2-RK10 Skimmer. ReefAngel. Radium 20k.
tkeracer619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/25/2019, 09:42 AM   #9
biecacka
Registered Member
 
biecacka's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 6,361
IMO for the bluer look you should have went with he radium or the Hamilton technology 20k
I have ran both of them and loved the look.


Corey


biecacka is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/25/2019, 02:49 PM   #10
Bpb
Registered Member
 
Bpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,148
If you came from T5HO or leds you have to honestly re-learn what CCT (kelvin) rating means. Frustrating as it may seem, MH were here first so you can’t fairly get mad at inconsistent or different appearances than what various t5 or led fixtures have trained you to think 14,000K looks like. 14,000k on an eco tech radion is bluer than most 20000K MH bulbs. The bluest you will get with a pure metal halide bulb will probably be a Hamilton 20,000k bulb on an electronic ballast. Not an m58, not an m80, and not on “hqi” or “270 watt” setting on an adjustable ballast. Electronic ballast set at 250 watts. If that’s not blue enough, halides just may not be for you. You’ll have a hard time bluing down MH bulbs with two t5’s. You’ll want 4 blue+ bulbs the length of the tank, plus a pair of higher powered blue leds like reefbrite XHO or the like. Only then will you start to make a dent.



That’s my own tank under 250 watt Hamilton 14k using m58 ballasts. Far from a deep
Blue actinic heavy fluorescent look. And this is one of the bluer 14k bulbs out there. The Ushio and some cheaper ones are much less blue than even this one. If you crave blue. Take a loss on the Phoenix bulbs. Sell your ballasts. And get 20k bulbs with electronic ballasts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Bpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/25/2019, 03:22 PM   #11
oreo57
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bpb View Post
If you came from T5HO or leds you have to honestly re-learn what CCT (kelvin) rating means. Frustrating as it may seem, MH were here first so you can’t fairly get mad at inconsistent or different appearances than what various t5 or led fixtures have trained you to think 14,000K looks like. 14,000k on an eco tech radion is bluer than most 20000K MH bulbs. The bluest you will get with a pure metal halide bulb will probably be a Hamilton 20,000k bulb on an electronic ballast. Not an m58, not an m80, and not on “hqi” or “270 watt” setting on an adjustable ballast. Electronic ballast set at 250 watts. If that’s not blue enough, halides just may not be for you. You’ll have a hard time bluing down MH bulbs with two t5’s. You’ll want 4 blue+ bulbs the length of the tank, plus a pair of higher powered blue leds like reefbrite XHO or the like. Only then will you start to make a dent.


That’s my own tank under 250 watt Hamilton 14k using m58 ballasts. Far from a deep
Blue actinic heavy fluorescent look. And this is one of the bluer 14k bulbs out there. The Ushio and some cheaper ones are much less blue than even this one. If you crave blue. Take a loss on the Phoenix bulbs. Sell your ballasts. And get 20k bulbs with electronic ballasts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Mh's were NEVER consistent in color temp ratings either.


oreo57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/25/2019, 04:59 PM   #12
Bpb
Registered Member
 
Bpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by oreo57 View Post
Mh's were NEVER consistent in color temp ratings either.


Didn’t mean to suggest they were. I understand the process behind the kelvin labeling well enough. The people that tend to have a hangup are people wanting to go bluer and bluer. Halide kelvin ratings from bulb to bulb are wildly inconsistent. The “ problem “ has been here long before reef leds were a thing is what I am indicating.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Bpb is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/26/2019, 01:11 PM   #13
JustAClownFish
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: California
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bpb View Post
If you came from T5HO or leds you have to honestly re-learn what CCT (kelvin) rating means. Frustrating as it may seem, MH were here first so you can’t fairly get mad at inconsistent or different appearances than what various t5 or led fixtures have trained you to think 14,000K looks like. 14,000k on an eco tech radion is bluer than most 20000K MH bulbs. The bluest you will get with a pure metal halide bulb will probably be a Hamilton 20,000k bulb on an electronic ballast. Not an m58, not an m80, and not on “hqi” or “270 watt” setting on an adjustable ballast. Electronic ballast set at 250 watts. If that’s not blue enough, halides just may not be for you. You’ll have a hard time bluing down MH bulbs with two t5’s. You’ll want 4 blue+ bulbs the length of the tank, plus a pair of higher powered blue leds like reefbrite XHO or the like. Only then will you start to make a dent.



That’s my own tank under 250 watt Hamilton 14k using m58 ballasts. Far from a deep
Blue actinic heavy fluorescent look. And this is one of the bluer 14k bulbs out there. The Ushio and some cheaper ones are much less blue than even this one. If you crave blue. Take a loss on the Phoenix bulbs. Sell your ballasts. And get 20k bulbs with electronic ballasts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I don't even know what all these M numbers mean. You said you are running them on an M58 ballast. Does that mean it's an eballast? Pulse start? Probe start? Magnetic? I'm so confused.

If I posted a picture from the same angle of my tank without my T5's the picture would be yellow.


JustAClownFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07/26/2019, 01:20 PM   #14
JustAClownFish
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: California
Posts: 226
I found a very good explanation regarding ballasts and lamps. I'm going to post it here in case other MH noobs are reading this thread.








Quote:
250-watt magnetic metal halide ballasts come in 3 types:

Probe start ANSI M58
Designed for standard North American probe start (self-starting) Single-Ended (SE) lamps.

Pulse start ANSI M138/M153
Designed for standard North American pulse start (none-self starting) Single-Ended lamps.

Pulse start/HQI ANSI M80
Designed for Double-Ended (DE) and European pulse start lamps. ANSI M80 is commonly referred to as a HQI ballast. It was intended for use with European high current operating lamps such as the HQI line of lamps from Osram.

Not many aquarium lamps are designed for use with a standard North American pulse start (ANSI M138/M153) ballast. Current Inc supplied and included 250-watt Double-Ended (DE) lamps that are designed for a pulse start ANSI M138/M153 ballast. The majority of 250-watt DE and European lamps available are designed for an ANSI M80 ballast and an ANSI M80 ballast will not overdrive these lamps. Using an ANSI M138/M153 ballast on lamps intended for use on an ANSI M80 ballast will cause the lamp to be under driven (operates lamp below wattage rating). This is because the ANSI M138/M153 ballast provides less operating lamp current to the lamp
Quote:
If the M80 does not overdrive bulbs. Why according to Sanjay's testing do bulbs very from low of 269 watts to 376 watts max. Would not any value above 250 be overdriving the bulb?

Quote:
Sanjay measured the input wattage draw (what the ballast, components and lamp uses together). The ballast and in some cases the other components will also use power. To know the true lamp power the wattage measurement has to be taken between the ballast and lamp. This generally requires a more complicated testing setup and different meters usually have to be used because the ballast output is distorted and because of the high open circuit voltage (up to 6000 Volts) associated with many ballasts.

The wattage varies depending on the lamp. During operation magnetic ballasts provide/limit lamp current to the lamp. The lamp is allowed to stabilize the operating voltage. This allows the lamp to be made slightly off the normal specs such as the Radium lamps which are rated above or below the standard wattage rating (depending on the lamp wattage). Any 250-watt labeled lamp may actually be rated and designed above or below that wattage. For example the Radium 250-watt lamp is designed to operate at 270-watts nominal with an ANSI M80 ballast. The lamp current for the Radium 250-watt lamp is the same as other 250-watt lamps designed for an ANSI M80 ballast but the design lamp operating voltage is higher. Many lamps are not truly rated the wattage they are labeled as.



JustAClownFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.