|
10/01/2017, 02:48 PM | #76 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 484
|
Very interesting thoughts, puts more emphasis of a quakity CUC and algae grazers like tangs or blennies I think.
Tim, do you plan on posting a tank update vid on your youtube channel? |
10/04/2017, 06:47 PM | #77 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
Yeah, but it'll be a few weeks. I've been wanting to set up my camera dolly for awhile but because of the glare off the windows I need to do it before sunrise or after sunset.
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
10/05/2017, 08:08 AM | #78 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
Gorgeous tank. I never did like skimmate as nutrient export. It is a marvelous thing to see a mature reef tank in operation. Multiple food webs processing and feeding the next interdependent level of processors. When I see numerous filter feeder with fans pumping, spaghetti worms undulating I like it.
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout |
|
10/28/2017, 06:28 PM | #79 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout Last edited by Subsea; 10/28/2017 at 07:36 PM. |
|
10/31/2017, 08:18 PM | #80 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 484
|
What are your guys' opinion on using Ozone? It seems lije an effective tool to help protect a system, especially with all of the chemical warfare that occurs amongst our corals. It's not like we have millions of gallons of ocean to dilute all that crap haha
|
10/31/2017, 09:41 PM | #81 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
I stopped using ozone a couple decades ago. There was no way to verify the equipment was working and calibrating it was flaky. Charles Delbeek in his presentaion at NextWave 2011 in Dallas gave the same reasons recommending aquarists not use it. Since then looking at the roles of DOC in promoting autotrophic vs heterotrophic microbial activity I've stumbled on research that shows there are ozone refractory DOC compounds and ozone also creates biodegradable DOC. Not knowing how those forms of DOC affect the growth of heterotrophic microbial populations which promote coral diseases and not having needed it to maintain my systems for 20+ years I won't use it.
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
11/01/2017, 05:20 AM | #82 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,033
|
Ozone, UV, peroxide, etc... they're all techniques to break down excess organics in the water column. This could be bacteria or plankton of any type. I run without any mechanical filtration - only cryptic sponges, algae scrubber and sand bed in the tank. So my water is full of organics. There is always the potential for something in the water to go to an extreme, so I keep a large UV plumbed in but not running ... like brakes to biology.
In nature, the top surface of the water is constantly sterilized by solar UV. This doesn't sound like it matters, but when you compare the surface area to volume of the reefs, it's actually a massive effect. I run MH so I get surface UV, but nowhere near the ratio in nature.
__________________
Failure isn't an option It's a requirement. 660g 380inwall+280smp/surge S/L/Soft/Maxima/RBTA/Clown/Chromis/Anthias/Tang/Mandarin/Jawfish/Goby/Wrasse/D'back. DIY 12' Skimmer ActuatedSurge ConcreteScape |
11/01/2017, 06:37 AM | #83 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
Quote:
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
|
11/01/2017, 07:48 AM | #84 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,033
|
I rarely use my uv. But I like to reduce risk.
It's no different than having a fire extinguisher in a kitchen. On algae, we can disagree. Not all algae are the same and my experience with turf has been very positive. On cryptic sponges, two thumbs up! Always a benefit with no downside I can see.
__________________
Failure isn't an option It's a requirement. 660g 380inwall+280smp/surge S/L/Soft/Maxima/RBTA/Clown/Chromis/Anthias/Tang/Mandarin/Jawfish/Goby/Wrasse/D'back. DIY 12' Skimmer ActuatedSurge ConcreteScape |
11/01/2017, 08:02 AM | #85 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
Because of the results I see in your systems, I know what you say works. For certain, many things in reef aquarium work. It more often than not totally depends on the husbandry skills and TLC of the operator. As I further analyze cause and effect of what you propose, it seems to me that you freeze the progression of nuisance algae with aggressive maintenance: aggressive vacume of substrate during frequent water change. While I am not totally convinced that “dilution is the solution to pollution” with water changes, I am convinced on cleaning sandbed so that inhabitants can breath and perform both oxidation and reduction chemistry. I would further like to discuss why limited use of GAC. What is the downside of continuous use? Also for some without large, mature biological filters, there is no other equal to the chemical absorption of GAC.
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout Last edited by Subsea; 11/01/2017 at 08:09 AM. |
|
11/01/2017, 11:02 AM | #86 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,033
|
I see GAC as a temporary reprieve delaying the need for water changes. It's not really permanent unless you change the media regularly... with all that effort, might as well run automatic water changes?
Let the good times roll!
__________________
Failure isn't an option It's a requirement. 660g 380inwall+280smp/surge S/L/Soft/Maxima/RBTA/Clown/Chromis/Anthias/Tang/Mandarin/Jawfish/Goby/Wrasse/D'back. DIY 12' Skimmer ActuatedSurge ConcreteScape |
11/01/2017, 03:49 PM | #87 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
When you are a zero discharge facility, water changes are not an option. I am not trying to simulate the diversity of the reef. I am cultivating mono cultures in “too many tanks”. To accomplish this I use GAC and UV.
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout |
11/01/2017, 05:41 PM | #88 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, MY
Posts: 813
|
I have been running a mixed reef (sticks dominated) 75G and the tank is still kicking and growing. I use GAC as skimmer replacement. Good job to everyone!
__________________
75 gallon DT, 5 gallon sump, DIY LED bar with moonlight, DIY Arduino controller Current Tank Info: 75 gallon/Arduino Controller |
11/02/2017, 05:33 AM | #89 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
Ken Felderman’s research on carbon dosing in reef tanks demonstrated DOC removal efficiencies: foam fractionators at best 30%, GAC at 50%-60% and reef tank inhabitants removed 75%.
DOC consists of many components, just like PAR is an accumulation of all spectrum between a certain range. So, I ask the question, which components of DOC do inverts absorb and which component does GAC. Considering the complexity of DOC, I would expect inverts to be selective as to what they process. Not so with GAC. Because of its unique characteristic of both absorption and adsorption (chemisorption) GAC is indiscriminate. Until it is saturated in its internal pore spaces GAC absorbs and when replaced removes DOC. Aside from cost, what is the downside of GAC?
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout Last edited by Subsea; 11/02/2017 at 07:08 PM. |
11/02/2017, 06:05 AM | #90 | |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
Quote:
GAC filtration is quite effective at stripping reef tank water of its TOC load, removing 60 - 85% of the TOC present. And, quite intriguingly, the natural biological filtration, which starts with bacteria and other microbes, is remarkable in its capacity to remediate reef tank water of TOC, easily removing 50% or more of the post-feeding TOC increase in tank water. I take it GAC removes 60 - 85% of of the various types of organic carbon available in the water. I'd wager ROX 0.8 would be even more effective. |
|
11/02/2017, 07:56 AM | #91 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,033
|
I don't see DOC as bad... I see if as food for the reef. Excess removal isn't the best scenario.
__________________
Failure isn't an option It's a requirement. 660g 380inwall+280smp/surge S/L/Soft/Maxima/RBTA/Clown/Chromis/Anthias/Tang/Mandarin/Jawfish/Goby/Wrasse/D'back. DIY 12' Skimmer ActuatedSurge ConcreteScape |
11/02/2017, 05:10 PM | #92 | |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
Quote:
In any case, the fish don't need DOCs. The photosynthesising corals don't need loitering DOC as their zooxanthallae make their own. That leaves heterotrophic organisms needing DOC. Like sponges. Removing too much DOC artificially will be detrimental to them. Infact it's their job to remove DOC from the water. I believe subsea was asking the question - do sponges, etc, remove a greater or less cross section of the various DOC components as activated carbon does, for example? Good question. Sponges may not remove the specific DOCs we would like removed from the water. I don't know? |
|
11/02/2017, 05:35 PM | #93 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,033
|
Biodiversity is much more than fish and corals. They're the tip of their respective food pyramids/webs but they sit on a much broader base.
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/sh...=27592&page=11
__________________
Failure isn't an option It's a requirement. 660g 380inwall+280smp/surge S/L/Soft/Maxima/RBTA/Clown/Chromis/Anthias/Tang/Mandarin/Jawfish/Goby/Wrasse/D'back. DIY 12' Skimmer ActuatedSurge ConcreteScape |
11/02/2017, 05:43 PM | #94 | |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
Quote:
your link is to the cryptic sponge & sea squirt thread I'm reading steve's books at the moment. Steve's emphasis on sponges is that they remove DOCs and replace skimmers & carbon. What he also points out, repeatedly is, sponges have the added advantage that they also remove water column bacteria, keeping densities low, & that this is a good thing. DOCs are bacteria food especially. |
|
11/02/2017, 07:01 PM | #95 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
Karim,
When you have a 1500G system, the biodiversity to process all components of DOC may we’ll be available. That is not the case for the average reefer. Think about this from a hobbiest point of view. Does he want a media bag of GAC to operate his reef tank or does he want 1500G of different ecosystems tied in to his reef tank.
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout |
11/02/2017, 07:05 PM | #96 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
Excess removal is the key. As in most things, it is a “Question of Balance”.
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout |
|
11/03/2017, 11:04 AM | #97 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
“Densely planted to work in freshwater, prevents competition from starting.” Makes perfect sense to me. Tim’s philosophy is to control the algae as it crops up. Then maintain this control until other elements in biological filter mature. I do not test parameters. I use bio indicators like cynobacteria or GHA to tell me what to do.
__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler, Patrick Castille Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout |
|
11/05/2017, 11:45 AM | #98 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
Hair Algae, A Case Study
Quote:
It's not aggressive removal at all. I persistantly remove as needed nuisance algae during weekly maintenance. I also rarely siphon sand. With this system for example, that means about 5-10 minutes on a roughly a monthly using a toothbrush to remove some cyano on some of the rocks during the weekly water change, which by the way only takes 15-20 minutes and I can't remember when I last bothered to remove any sand. +++++++++++++++++++++ I will use aggresive methods initially when I'm called to correct a nuisance algae problem. Here's a recent example of a 4' tall roughly 200 gallon 4 year old system. GFO and algaecide had been used by the previous maintenance company. The PO4 was .02 mg/l, much lower than most reefs. As can be seen the algae is doing very well. https://youtu.be/lqeqtxjPxgU Initial steps including removing about half the rock and scrubbing off the algae (a couple pieces were not reused). Removing the GFO and filter sock used by previous maintenance companies, turning off the skimmer and adding an autofeeder with multiple daily feedings. (As near as could be determined discussing the tank's history with the new clients the fish were only being fed once a week by the previous maintenance company.) Water changes are also using tapwater with dechlorinator. The following 3 pics are during a cleaning weeks after the initial cleaning. Just to clarify the only time the rocks were removed to be scrubbed was the initial cleaning. Scrubbing the rock with the scrub brush during the weekly cleanings took roughly 15 minutes. http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...0feebdd256.jpg http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...7995ed35ca.jpg http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...7f1e298f72.jpg Here's about 4 months after the initial cleaning. The hair algae has largey disappeared from the areas I can't get too but some red cyano has showed up on some of the rock and on the sand. http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...4469be7349.jpg Here's 2 weeks later. The cyano is more prevelant. Again the only thing I'm doing is small 5% - 7% weekly water changes during which I siphon off the algae. http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...eb4a700fda.jpg http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...70b1b0974f.jpg And here's a month after the cyano showed up. Repeatedly seeing shifts in ecosystems like this over the years with only small water changes and manual removal is one of the reasons Rohwer's DDAM model best explains what's going on in our aquariums. (For those who are reading this for the first time I highly recommend getting Rohwer's book "Coral Reefs in the Microbial Seas".) http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...f2a0084aa4.jpg Here's 5 1/2 months after the initial cleaning. This is also 3 weeks without scrubbing off the rocks, nuisance algae has significantly slowed down. http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...8a2b7fdaf7.jpg Here's 7 months after initial cleaning. http://s3.amazonaws.com/arcipsbucket...748a91d16a.jpg
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
|
11/05/2017, 11:50 AM | #99 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
Quote:
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
|
11/05/2017, 01:45 PM | #100 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,033
|
Some points and I assembled my own conclusions
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00572672 https://www.google.com/amp/s/wattsup...ect-lakes/amp/ http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80.../#.Wf9p_YVMGEc
__________________
Failure isn't an option It's a requirement. 660g 380inwall+280smp/surge S/L/Soft/Maxima/RBTA/Clown/Chromis/Anthias/Tang/Mandarin/Jawfish/Goby/Wrasse/D'back. DIY 12' Skimmer ActuatedSurge ConcreteScape |
|
|