Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 12/09/2017, 02:30 PM   #1
Chicagoreef2016
Registered Member
 
Chicagoreef2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 315
ATI Essentials vs Triton

I know ATI Essentials is relatively new over here in the US, does anyone have any experience with either that or Triton, and why you may have picked one va the other? Triton seems to make a lot of sense to me in that you test and dose based off of the results. Happy for opinions/experiences.


__________________
127ish gallon SC tank and associated equipment
Chicagoreef2016 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/21/2018, 12:48 PM   #2
muttley000
MTS Sufferer!
 
muttley000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,926
Bump to the top. Who is using which and why?


__________________
Next step on the system is adding A 90 gallon!

Current Tank Info: 475 multitank system is now running! Several hundred gallons of additions planned!
muttley000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/21/2018, 01:18 PM   #3
JordyRoo
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 38
Ive just started using ATI, switched from Red Sea, the cost of the Essentials is cheap. In the uk its £30 for 3 x 1ltr bottles that mix to 3 x 10ltrs of dosing fluids. The essentials have the majority of the trace elements in them too. You send off your ICP test & dose accordingly.


JordyRoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/21/2018, 11:13 PM   #4
rffanat1c
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kenosha, WI
Posts: 693
I have no experience with either but I will be doing ATI simply because I do not need the sump with algae, turnover rates, and cost. ATI comes off as less finicky than Triton and seems to offer the same benefits.


rffanat1c is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01/22/2018, 12:26 AM   #5
Scrubber_steve
I'm really very likeable
 
Scrubber_steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by rffanat1c View Post
I have no experience with either but I will be doing ATI simply because I do not need the sump with algae, turnover rates, and cost. ATI comes off as less finicky than Triton and seems to offer the same benefits.
There is the 'Triton Method' line of elements, & then there's the 'Triton Other Methods' line for people who don't use the algae fuge system.
The trace elements differ between the two lines.


Scrubber_steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/10/2018, 12:37 PM   #6
italquam
Registered Member
 
italquam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 384
This is a good question because I have been curious of difference between the two

Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk


__________________
"Steel Curtain"

Current Tank Info: 110 gallon Oceanic Fish Only with Live rock, Purple Tang,2- Oscellaris Clown, Foxface Lo, Royal Gramma, and Coral Beauty
italquam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.