NOW IN STOCK: AquaMaxx ConeS CO-2 and CO-3 Protein Skimmers

[sharky's machin]

When will the CO1 be in stock?

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by sharky's machin

When will the CO1 be in stock?

As early as Wednesday this week, as late as next week. More than 1/3 are already reserved for other hobbyists so you may want to sign up to be notified when they arrive if you aren't already. We BELIEVE we brought in enough inventory to get through the holidays, but it's hard to tell with this new series because we keep selling out immediately after they arrive!

[Buganddoug]

Okay I have a 180 mostly heavily stock SPS and some LPS with many fish. The skimmer I am using is way to big for my system. What Cone S would you say I should use. Or do you think I would be better off with another brand?

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by Buganddoug

Okay I have a 180 mostly heavily stock SPS and some LPS with many fish. The skimmer I am using is way to big for my system. What Cone S would you say I should use. Or do you think I would be better off with another brand?

With SPS corals and a heavy bio-load, we feel the Cone 3 is your best option. Another option to consider for your tank is the Reef Octopus DCS-250.

[Buganddoug]

If it was your Tank What would you Pick Cone 3 or DCS-250 and why?

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by Buganddoug

If it was your Tank What would you Pick Cone 3 or DCS-250 and why?

Well, if you want to make it personal ... I would choose the Reef Octopus DCS-250 because the DC pump is not only safe and efficient, but it also makes it very easy to adjust your skimmer without getting your hands dirty! — Robert @ Marine Depot

[Buganddoug]

Thank you Robert That's all I need to know. Now I will Let the Wife know. Christmas Gift for me!!

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by Buganddoug

Thank you Robert That's all I need to know. Now I will Let the Wife know. Christmas Gift for me!!

You're very welcome. Always happy to lend a hand. Have a foamy Christmas!

[GatorsUF]

what do you recommend for a heavily stocked 90 gallon mixed reef?

[breadfan]

I am impressed to see all the models still in stock. I ordered a CO1 yesterday.

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by GatorsUF

what do you recommend for a heavily stocked 90 gallon mixed reef?

The AquaMaxx EcoMaxx EM200 In-Sump Protein Skimmer would be a great choice (15% off today with coupon code EPICSALE and includes free shipping).

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by breadfan

I am impressed to see all the models still in stock. I ordered a CO1 yesterday.

Looks like CO-2 and CO-3 are gone now. Wow! We were confident we had enough stock for the holidays. These skimmers are HOT!

[ECFENCING]

What would you recommend for a heavily stocked 50 gallon + 15 gallon sump operating level and 8" water depth ?

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by ECFENCING

What would you recommend for a heavily stocked 50 gallon + 15 gallon sump operating level and 8" water depth ?

The CO-1 is a great choice and would certainly get the job done. If you want something with a little stronger pump for heavier bioloads, the EM200 would be a great alternative.

[ECFENCING]

thanks I prefer the CO-1 since it's more compact but will an 8" sump depth be ok? I desgined my sump with an 8" baffle

the specs state 9.5" water level

[CReyes350]

I currently own a Skimz 161and that thing is a monster in my 120 galllon system, I absolutely love it. I am currently in the market for another skimmer to drop in a similar setup. How does the Aquamaxx cone 2 compare in performance to the skimz 161?

Thanks!

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by ECFENCING

thanks I prefer the CO-1 since it's more compact but will an 8" sump depth be ok? I desgined my sump with an 8" baffle

the specs state 9.5" water level

The CO-1 does run better at a water depth of 9.5" because of the raised outlet pipe. This 9.5" water depth will prevent micro-bubbles and excess splashing noise. The EM200 may be a better choice for this reason as it will run perfect at an 8" water depth.

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by CReyes350

I currently own a Skimz 161and that thing is a monster in my 120 galllon system, I absolutely love it. I am currently in the market for another skimmer to drop in a similar setup. How does the Aquamaxx cone 2 compare in performance to the skimz 161?

Thanks!

After comparing the specs it appears the skimmers are quite similar. I see the pumps have comparable ratings and the reaction chamber is exactly the same at 6" in diameter.

The CO-2 does include the innovative bubble plate making for increased contact time and utilizes the Sicce brand name pump which are some extra benefits. For these reasons, I believe the CO-2 would be a great alternative for your aquarium and should perform similar if not better than your current skimmer.

[CReyes350]

Originally Posted by MarineDepot

After comparing the specs it appears the skimmers are quite similar. I see the pumps have comparable ratings and the reaction chamber is exactly the same at 6" in diameter.

The CO-2 does include the innovative bubble plate making for increased contact time and utilizes the Sicce brand name pump which are some extra benefits. For these reasons, I believe the CO-2 would be a great alternative for your aquarium and should perform similar if not better than your current skimmer.

Thank you for the quick response! One last question- What is the difference between the cone and cone S? I have been trying to research it, but i havent found any straight forward answers.

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by CReyes350

Thank you for the quick response! One last question- What is the difference between the cone and cone S? I have been trying to research it, but i havent found any straight forward answers.

Always glad to help.

In reality, the skimmers are quite similar. The main differences are the upgraded bubble plate included on the ConeS series and the addition of a handle on the collection cup. Otherwise, they are pretty much identical.

I have used both skimmers on my own aquarium and was impressed with both the quality of the construction and performance. I think you will be happy no matter which option you choose.

-Robert F.

[ECFENCING]

Originally Posted by MarineDepot

The CO-1 does run better at a water depth of 9.5" because of the raised outlet pipe. This 9.5" water depth will prevent micro-bubbles and excess splashing noise. The EM200 may be a better choice for this reason as it will run perfect at an 8" water depth.

thanks! so do you think the em-200 will be overkill for a 50 gallon system + 15 gallon sump operating level? Reason I ask is that I have a psk-1000 atb mini airstar on my system right now with a vertex in-100 body and it seems to skim for a day or two then stop.

I know it depends on the system and it could also be due to the fact that I transferred over all of my rock and corals from a holding tank and did a 100% water change.

[BoricuaMojao]

Originally Posted by MarineDepot

Always glad to help.

In reality, the skimmers are quite similar. The main differences are the upgraded bubble plate included on the ConeS series and the addition of a handle on the collection cup. Otherwise, they are pretty much identical.

I have used both skimmers on my own aquarium and was impressed with both the quality of the construction and performance. I think you will be happy no matter which option you choose.

-Robert F.

Robert, I purchased a ConeS-1 from you guys recently and have it set up in 9.5" of water in the sump. The silencer is partially submerged (the bottom part) and it keeps getting water in it which in turn makes an annoying bubbling sound.

Any suggestions?

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by ECFENCING

thanks! so do you think the em-200 will be overkill for a 50 gallon system + 15 gallon sump operating level? Reason I ask is that I have a psk-1000 atb mini airstar on my system right now with a vertex in-100 body and it seems to skim for a day or two then stop.

I know it depends on the system and it could also be due to the fact that I transferred over all of my rock and corals from a holding tank and did a 100% water change.

It is a strong skimmer but with a heavy bio-load, it will work great for a tank of your size. Especially if you want to achieve a low nutrient system for SPS corals.

Skimate production is based around your organic waste levels and it does make sense you experienced less skimate collection immediately after a large water change.

[MarineDepot]

Originally Posted by BoricuaMojao

Robert, I purchased a ConeS-1 from you guys recently and have it set up in 9.5" of water in the sump. The silencer is partially submerged (the bottom part) and it keeps getting water in it which in turn makes an annoying bubbling sound.

Any suggestions?

This skimmer is a bit different because of the raised outlet pipe which leaves little room for water level changes.

The best operating level will be just above the outlet and below the air silencer bracket. This does not leave much room for changing water levels, however, if you keep the level just above the outlet and below the silencer bracket, you should not have any problems.

You might also try tightening the screw that holds the silencer in place to help deter water from entering the silencer.

[BoricuaMojao]

Originally Posted by MarineDepot

This skimmer is a bit different because of the raised outlet pipe which leaves little room for water level changes.

The best operating level will be just above the outlet and below the air silencer bracket. This does not leave much room for changing water levels, however, if you keep the level just above the outlet and below the silencer bracket, you should not have any problems.

You might also try tightening the screw that holds the silencer in place to help deter water from entering the silencer.

Thanks, I tried that already.

Since I built the sump with the 9.5 inch skimmer chamber I'm thinking I'll just raise the skimmer slightly with something underneath.