|
12/17/2017, 10:32 AM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Thinking about Switching to Bare Bottom
I have a 100G primarily SPS tank that I have been running since February, 2016 and I have battled algae a few times over that period, as most do I would guess. It's not terrible but I am trying to keep it from getting there. So I am thinking about gradually switching to bare bottom. The way I would get there is to vacuum up the sand bed during water changes until it is all gone. (I have a new larger gravel vacuum that takes up a lot of sand anyway.) So any thoughts on this? Will bare bottom help towards keeping nutrients under better control? I am thinking I can vacuum up detritus more easily that way. Also fyi, I have always vacuumed my sand bed so there should not be any danger here.
Thanks!
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
12/17/2017, 04:12 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mankato, MN
Posts: 864
|
I did the same thing as you're thinking over a year ago (I honestly can't remember now). I'm curious how long has the sand bed been in service? Do you vacuum it regularly and have good flow over all areas of it?
Personally, I had to take other measures along with it to get nutrients down but it definitely helps to keep detritus suspended which is always a plus.
__________________
Tim Current tanks: 30 gallon rimless, G2 radion, Vertex 130, MP10w 60 gallon rimless, G3 radion, Vertex 130, MP40QD |
12/17/2017, 05:35 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 771
|
Personally I dont like running a reef BB. I tried it twice on 2 systems and had some issues. Mainly alk was harder to keep stable, still do able but needed to be watched closey. Also it did not seem to help with algae much if any, for me at least. Finding a happy compromise with flow was challenging. There are pros and cans to having or not having a sand bed.
|
12/17/2017, 06:09 PM | #4 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
I think my main issue is that I have to feed a lot and I am certain that food ends up in the sand bed and I am thinking that BB would allow me to clean that up a bit better. Thanks.
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
|
12/17/2017, 06:10 PM | #5 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
|
12/18/2017, 03:57 AM | #6 |
Dogmatic Dinosaur
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 6,256
|
What are your actual nutrient levels.
Were are the nutrients coming from? Usually, sand helps to process the nutrients along with other maintenance and a fuge (or other Phosphate export). If the nutrients are coming from dry/dead rock, then this will not help. You need to stop vacuuming your sand bed and let it settle into oxic and anoxic areas. Once this is done, it should take your N down under 1 and very healthy. This could be why you have nutrient issues... it does better if not disturbed for long periods of time. (I do vacuum mine starting in year five and only doing about 20-25% every quarter - I do this slowly so that the anoxic zones can re-establish) |
12/18/2017, 05:51 AM | #7 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
I don't think my live is rock is the problem because early on I did have this problem with my live rock but that eventually ended. Going on 2 years now. I think the nutrients are coming from food debris in the tank. There always seems to be food crumbs that end up floating to the bottom. I feed 1/2 cube spirulina per day with some nori sheets added in for a 5" fox face , 3" Kole tang, clownfish pair, yellow assessor and possum wrasse. If I feed less than this the fox face starts losing weight. I wasn't aware about not vacuuming the sand. There seems to be so much fish poo in certain areas that I feel like I have to vacuum that up. I was thinking that vacuuming the sand was a way of removing waste that will break down and create more nutrients. I will have to think about this. Thanks for your comments.
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
|
12/18/2017, 11:03 AM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 771
|
|
12/19/2017, 10:45 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sheffield Lake, OH
Posts: 1,231
|
I was always skeptical and anti-BB for the better part of the past decade, decided to give it a fair chance last summer and never looked back. It has its pros and cons, i've never had any stability issues.
__________________
When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find a person where life gave them vodka and have a party. ~ Ron White Current Tank Info: 120g SPS dominated |
12/19/2017, 01:05 PM | #10 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 262
|
Quote:
__________________
Current tank info: Marineland 180gal (6ftx2ftx2ft), 8" Reef Octopus skimmer, 6 Hydra52s, AquaForest Comp 1,2,3 |
|
12/19/2017, 05:59 PM | #11 |
you cant buy blue fingers
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,542
|
Siphon it you will be fine. I have always had no issues removing it all in one go. Done it twice. Make sure your rock is stable.
__________________
False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but false views supported by some evidence, do little harm, for every one takes a salutary pleasure in proving their falseness. Current Tank Info: 90 gallon 36x24x24 reef |
12/19/2017, 07:24 PM | #12 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
Sounds like a good holiday project!
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
|
12/19/2017, 07:53 PM | #13 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 771
|
Quote:
Now if you already have a high demand for alk and already have a dosing system that keeps the tank stable then you may not notice/have alk issues. Last edited by DesertReefT4r; 12/19/2017 at 08:02 PM. |
|
12/19/2017, 07:54 PM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 213
|
Don't assume that going bare bottom means no more siphoning of the bottom of the tank. If you have dead spots with flow now they will still be there. A monster clean up crew could help out as well. Mix up snails that like to bury in the sand with ones that don't along with a nice group of crabs.
|
12/19/2017, 09:14 PM | #15 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
|
12/19/2017, 09:18 PM | #16 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
|
12/19/2017, 09:24 PM | #17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 771
|
Large cuc is a bad idea. If it's just to remove the pest algae then removing them or most from the tank thats fine. You dont want all those snails and crabs to die after all the algae is gone. Here is what will happen. Add cuc, cuc eats most of the algae and you remove the rest with cleaning, nutrients issues is resolved leaving little algae growth, cuc dies releasing all the nutrients they consumed by eating the aglae back into the system, now you are right back where you started. Removing the cuc after the issue is resolved not only prevents their death but removes the nutrients from the system. Keep only what your system can sustain, for 100g reef I would have under 20 snails and maybe 5-10 hermits total, 1-2 emerald crabs and a few tangs. The 1-2 snails per gallon rule is way to many.
|
12/20/2017, 08:27 AM | #18 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
|
12/20/2017, 08:47 AM | #19 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sheffield Lake, OH
Posts: 1,231
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find a person where life gave them vodka and have a party. ~ Ron White Current Tank Info: 120g SPS dominated |
||
12/20/2017, 09:28 AM | #20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: sf bay area
Posts: 5,165
|
I have done both. started with sand, then restarted with bare bottom.
now I just restarted and went back to sand (aragonite). from my experience, the bare bottom only looks nice at first, in a few months, or years, it will be harder to keep it clean and in my case, after like 5 years, the bottom is just filled with crap that is ugly and impossible to clean. Mostly thick coralines and calcium build ups and lots of sand like particles (I assume this are calcium precipitate). I would not go back to bare bottom. |
12/21/2017, 12:25 AM | #21 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 7
|
I prefer barebottom for SPS tanks. Easier to keep detritus under control and you can have higher flow without blowing sand all over.
|
12/21/2017, 02:00 AM | #22 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 556
|
Go bare bottom once and you’ll never think about having sand ever again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12/21/2017, 06:11 AM | #23 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,697
|
Thanks. This was my thinking and reasoning.
__________________
100G Fairly New Aspiring SPS/Mixed Reef - 48" x 24" x 20" |
12/21/2017, 03:42 PM | #24 |
Dogmatic Dinosaur
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 6,256
|
After giving bare bottom a shot for two years, I would never again be without sand.
I seriously think that if you just leave your sand alone then you will get that you are looking for out of your tank. Vacuuming sand is probably not as good as either having a living sand ecosystem or BB - it is a bad place in the middle, IMO. Once the fish poo has been around for a few hours, it is mostly benign. Dr. Holmes-Farley has indicated that nearly all of the phosphate and most of the organics are excreted in urine and what is offered organically in the poo is quickly consumed in the tank (hours). IME, the stuff can gum up the works, which is why I vacuum a bit after 4-5 years. What I am trying to say is that by the time that you get around to vacuuming up detritus, it is just for aesthetics and not to lower nutrients. |
12/22/2017, 09:03 PM | #25 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 771
|
Quote:
__________________
Tank history 29g tropical ,55g cichlid tank, 20H softy reef, 29g mixed reef, 20H brackish goby & puffer tank, 55g mixed reef, 6g Nanocube softy lps reef, 40B sps reef, 75g sps reef, 75g sps reef in bu Current Tank Info: 75g sps reef build in the works. |
|
|
|