|
|
|
07/13/2011, 12:08 PM
|
#1 |
|
Theorist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Peters MO, 63376
Posts: 1,608
|
Bio Pellet Reactor Question
Based on most of what I have seen in regards to bio pellet reactors, is that they are all water in water out and the flow rate is based on whatever is required to get a good roll out of the pellets.
My question is, would there be any benefit (or detriment) to use a calcium reactor type set up? I'm referring to using a recirculation pump for the correct flow rate, but a slower water in water out flow rate. Has anyone done this? Any noticeable affect in doing so? |
|
|
|
07/13/2011, 12:57 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,406
|
The pellets have to be constantly moving. A calcium reactor can't keep the bio-pellet moving due to it's low water flow . Therefore, it would be ineffective at removing bacteria.
__________________
Since Jan 2008 Current system: 170G+50g Sump/Bio-Pellet Reactor. 2x400w Radium+2x110w VHO. 2 x HYDRO Magnum 8 + 1xMP60w (removed 2 x Koralia 4). SWC 300A Cone (had SWC 200 w/ Red Demon); it's AWESOME! BRS DOSER(Cal, Alk, and Mag). Current Tank Info: 170g+50g sump |
|
|
|
|
07/13/2011, 03:01 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Theorist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Peters MO, 63376
Posts: 1,608
|
Quote:
My thinking is that the water in and out would be in the rector chamber longer and thus a bit more efficient at removing no3.....but just a thought. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bio Pellet Reactor question ? | reefrubble | Tampa Bay Reef Club | 8 | 02/01/2011 07:15 AM |
